donkofkong
Donkofkong
donkofkong

If you have to make extra effort to try to bring people who would otherwise not seek out your business to work in it you are hiring the wrong type of people. If white bros are coming to that company and making the effort all on their own to find the job and work there then they have every right to try to get the job.

This isn’t food related, just another trojan horse to complain about politics again. Unless this site has a history of discussing how food is purchased i’m not up on.

People will absolutely make it about him at some point though and people probably are. When it comes to pushback like this ad is getting “guilt by association” is all over the damn place.

Hell we have seen actors called out for being white playing characters they didnt know where originally not white in the original

This is just using the weak attachment to the topic of food as a vessel to talk about something all together unrelated with the proposed scope of the site. A really lazy way to pad out content or try to merge out of your lane as a food site.

Like they might as well report on anything that happens within a 50 foot

I posted an 8 word question i didn’t expect a response to but did understand it would be recognized as a criticism and this was really my only intention. Its all of you who complained who gave it more importance than that. I’m only responding to the continued engagement from people like you, without that it really

I would imagine user analytics for the media group might be interested on if readers are interested in articles are not.

Everyone is complaining way more about my post than the implied complaint i made with the comment to begin with. “WHO CARES MOVE ON” same could be said of anyone who stops to comment on my comment.

Those are comments on entirely different articles. They exist independently of this event and aren’t part of this. Sure, there is overlap in the statements of some past comments because i do often call out when something has nothing to do with the proposed editorial content of the website. Its not my fault they do it

There is nothing disingenuous about my question. What does it have to do with food? When you run my life you can make the choice about what i genuinely want to know. Until then, stuff your nonsense commentary up your ass.

Its silly to think you need to be in charge of website before you can have a problem with what

If you google this site this is what you see.

What does this have to do with food? 

“Of course, you could skip all of this by playing with your console in docked mode. “

And with this it proves there was no point to the entire article.  

Makes more sense than Control does being nominated. 

If mistreatment of LGTBQ people was just as immoral then why could so many be able to do it with such impunity? You cant be ignorant enough to feel like morals of now were always the morals of the day and that just because something is seen one way now that’s how it was always seen. You are avoiding this because its

Its about inclusion Natalie, something this website doesnt shut up about. 

I know how laws work, im the one telling you how they protected people in the past from moral mongers like you. He still didnt do the work if he didnt get the job done as far as im concerned. Quit it with your participation trophy nonsense. Its good you recognize its not actually a law though means you understand the

I don’t vote for anyone ever. No one is ever my president. I do that specifically because of people like you that would try to attribute to me the actions someone i might vote in take. 

Im not saying Trump is more “moral” than Obama by anyone’s definition. Im saying morals and laws are different. Morals alone are subjective and not enforceable by law. I dont need to justify anyones moral behavior as morals are an individual choice. If you want things done in a specific way then you need to make it a

So the issue here is her parents didnt bother to learn dress code, when their child couldnt get their picture taken under the rules they played victim and blamed the school for the very clear in the handbook rule?

In the end they took her out of the charter school which are schools that generally perform better than

Is this the apex of your moral high ground?