Your “Aha! Caught you” act is painful.

I agree that rugby players are soft. Rugby league players, on the other hand, are not. This guy is playing rugby league.

“What if instead of a drink... it’s urine.” Thanks for that, Matt. I’ll be chuckling all morning at the image I’ve just visualised of you, in your fancy suit, drenched in still-warm piss. We can only dream.

Why wait for a war?

I’m pretty sure the best response is to let the little piss babies have their I’m Triggered party and just fucking ignore them. In all likelihood there’s only be about 40 of them anyway so who gives a shit. Milo was over years ago, just stop serving him and let him stumble off into the night when he realises no-one’s…

Buuuuullshiiiiit.

That’s ok, I gathered early on that you have some command of freshman level economics. I just don’t feel any need to engage with you when you can’t acknowledge anything beyond that (and, to be fair, are refusing to acknowledge some fairly straightforward contradiction of your basic premises eg the idea that landlords…

So the answer is no, you don't think political campaigns you support are obliged to report potentially illegal foreign contact. Thanks, I have what I need here.

This is pointless. You refuse to acknowledge that landlords are not property developers, that rent control doesn’t have to eliminate the rental market (capping =/= removing profitability) or that landlords are not the only source of housing demand. So there is no argument to be made.

Ok, so you won’t back off the misdirection. Landlord and property developer are not inseperable - that’s garbage. Is StubHub the same thing as the Dallas Cowboys?

So “the Left” conspired against Bernie Sanders? Which side is Sanders from?

The misdirection you are using here is pretending that landlords and property developers are the same thing. In your bread example, you are implying that landlords are bakers whereas in fact their role is acquiring bread that has already been baked and selling it on for a profit. They are, literally, rent seekers -…

Yes, but as we all know an artist cannot claim ownership of his or her work once it is in the world and therefore subject to interpretation. In this case, as the most common pronunciation is "gif" I think we can say that is by definition correct.

I agree, but actually it's pronounced "gif".

I don’t know. They’ve already clawed their way back into the series. Changing tactics now could really scuttle their hopes.

Not remotely, I’m afraid. I emigrated 13 years ago and have more or less completely lost interest in football other than a lingering desire to see Liverpool and Chelsea fail.

Oh yes.

That’s fine mate, enjoy it. I was brought up in England in the 80s so I’m happy to offer this constructive and valid counterpoint: fuck Liverpool for all time.

Also, if a city hosts a campaign rally in the full knowledge that it probably won’t be paid, shouldn’t that be considered an (illegal) in-kind donation?

Who is Judge Smails?