domvasta
Dom
domvasta

That's not true. The revisionism is that they were pitch black. There are so many primary sources describing their Nubian neighbours as dark and black. The Egyptians wrote a lot about battle and it's just dumb to make out that Egypt was only conquered beginning with the Romans and the Greeks. Egyptian literature is

No. Egyptians clearly painted three sorts of people in their art. Black people, like from Nubia their neighbor to the south, pale people, who were presumably Western European people, and copper colored people who included the Egyptians themselves. You want to look at what ancient Egyptians looked like? Look at the

No, saying that all Africans are and were white or "pitch black" is historical revisionism. Seriously, there's more genetic diversity within Africa than there is outside of it. The San, the Yoruba, the Zulu, the Nubians, and the Kikuyu are not identical to one another.

I think you are committing the same sin as the Aryan/Neo-Nazis are (albeit, not evilly). You are undoubtedly correct that in some point in the past, people living in the area we now call modern or ancient Egypt were black Africans. But the issue of interest is what "race" were the people who built the Sphinx and the

And where do you think Arabs and Caucasians came from? We're all out of Africa, race is mostly an adaptation to climate. I don't really buy that everyone in North Africa drove back everyone who was "pitch black" and took over. There's no indication that that happened. Much more likely that the people with

No. They did not depict themselves as black in the early dynasties. The Nubian pharoahs were later. It is sheer ignorance to claim that a continent as large as Africa was monocultural or monoracial.