If a female streamer admitted to infidelity she would have to move to another planet to avoid the harassment and even then they would build rocket ships and travel through wormholes that sent them a million years into the future just for the chance to hunt her down and call her a whore.

Your starting point is “The ad was racist” because you and all the people you quoted projected their own ideas onto the ad and you’re working backwards to prove it.

Fox News would basically become a TRUMP 2020 24/7 political ad.

If it comes out that Salling was himself a victim of child abuse and that he was acting out a cycle of abuse would you still feel like “nothing was lost.”

Wat? There’s a ton of great stuff on Amazon. Marvelous Mrs. Maisel is one of the best shows I’ve seen in years. Probably my favorite “New Show” since The Good Place. The Tick is great. Sneaky Pete is very fun. Goliath with Billy Bob Thornton was excellent AND it didn’t have any women being menanced or sexually…

Also people are projecting all kinds of shit at Three Billboards that isn’t in the movie and saying it does things it doesn’t do while missing what it DOES talk about. Like saying it redeems racism while ignoring how it talks about the normalization of domestic abuse while it literally states it’s thesis near the end…

This is so so so so so wrong. The Academy Awards are and always have been a political horse race.

At Hollywood Studios where you get your pictures taken with Mickey and Minnie, they have two movie posters. One for a film starring Mickey and one for a film starring Minnie.

I do! And it’s a very good point. The difference here is consistency and the authority figures surrounding the case. With the Satanic Panic, many of those kids WERE actually being molested, just not by Satanists. Take for instance the McMartin Daycare case.

Of course they didn’t vote for anything they didn’t see. The question is, “if they actually hold the awards in the respect you say they do...why not SEE all the films before voting?” Because while not a one says they voted for a film they didn’t see...almost all admitted to not watching a good chunk of the nominees…

Hey Ralph, I used to be where you are. I too was all, “I believe Dylan but I think it had to have been the uncle. The one who was actually convincted of molestation.” That was before I fully recovered the memories of my own and I fully realized how impossible it is to have memories THOSE vivid and strong and have them…

Have you not read the thing THR does every year where they reveal how 5-6 random Academy voters vote? Most of them admit to just going with people they like having never seen the actual films.

YOU are an absolute and complete joke and I wasted enough time on you. Bye, rape apologist!

So a gaslighter as well as a rape apologist. Bye, Jan!

It’s “an hysteric”, genius.

The best thing I can say is to trust your instincts. If you feel like someone is playing games with you or fucking with your head or making you feel uncomfortable or pushed from the get go, they probably are trying to keep you off guard for a reason.

You’re a rape apologist and idiot who doesn’t know what words mean.

You don’t know what words and concepts mean. Why the fuck would I care what you think of me?

You’re god damn right I’m aggressive, dumb ass.

Rae Sanchini, one of the executive producers, was told about the abuse and nothing happened. According to multiple people, Dushku’s male friend almost attacked the guy at one point over it and security had to be involved.