I think it was a really great stretch actually. The body of the car, in fact the whole styling of it is rather far from purposefully succinct.

Usability and design are primary qualities of the final article. Especially considering that these systems are somehow supposed to make the cars seem like products of super useful leading edge design. If the test is whether it falls apart, then it still doesn't pass, a DNS is the same as a DNF. Quality of design,…

"trees and turning white"

thank you!

It kinda does actually. Sure it's not critical to the machine running down the highway, but it's like having the throttle on the dash in one car and on the armrest in another. If the principle is broken, then in practice it's as if the article is physically broken. Because if you can't use it you won't.

Jaguar C-X75

That's just asking for a road trip!

it also does it at nearly lightspeed, which ought to count for something.

In french in Quebec the Premier is actually called Le Premier Ministre. Same name different seat of govt.

As a Montrealer I'm offended at your suggestion that Quebec should sink.

That makes your next One77 purchase out to be the handsome sum of 2.237mil

Also it was a lot more recent. It was the 2011 F1 car, which got introduced at the very end of January '11

votes for one of the worst logos of a major brand in any market?

They were clever enough to realize that the paint on the cap was a recognized icon. Also their typesetting was far more difficult to read and similar in look to Coca Cola.

I forgot this scene was so much like Shake Hands Man.

you may return your jalop card at the front desk on your way out.

..he says, as though that has ever happened, ever.

That you're pretty much right.

I'm with you on that. I suffered through his videos once or twice and I think i've had my fill. Which is a pity because i know he actually has something intelligent to say about driving.

Did you figure out what you were doing?