They did what friends do. None of them said what he did was ok. They provided character references of their friend as they knew him. Thats what happens in criminal cases every single day throughout the country. The only difference is these got publicized. 

same. i need my watch history, channel subscriptions, and everything. i watch youtube for purely utilitarian purposes, and i want it to be efficient finding me information. don’t need to waste time going through millions of random choices i’ll never care for.

This! The “Big Evil algorithms” aren’t out to get you. They’re there to serve you content you WANT to watch. Everyone wins when the algo is showing you stuff you want to see.

There’s only one ideal hockey player and it’s Shorsey

“But despite the escalating online demands for Russell to face prison time, you do have to wonder how jail and criminalization could be the solution to what’s clearly an ongoing mental health crisis.”

Lip filler and boob job is a drop in the bucket. She’s had way more than that done, as have her sisters, and their denials are pretty hilarious. I mean, Khloe basically got a face transplant and industrial scale liposuction and probably rib removal and butt  implants and probably procedures most of us haven’t even…

Fix what? If you allow instantaneous quit-outs without consequence, Hardcore loses any meaning, as you just keep a panic disconnect switch on hand if shit gets out of hand. There’s no practical way to distinguish between that and a “legitimate” disconnect.

Did AIMusk write this?

Of course Jezebel takes the route of making the man look bad in this situation when the general consensus has been that Rexha is shitty and toxic for:

His strategy makes sense considering I find it a bit shocking now if a superhero movie doesn’t include at least two heroes in it. And Gunn’s work tends to skew towards a group of people/heroes working (reluctantly or otherwise) together.

Doesn’t matter. Once you put it out in public you lose control over what people do with it. It is a dangerous line to think you can restrict public information and knowledge because someone might use it in a way you didn’t expect or now want to profit off of. 

How is this any different from how they built the search engine? Public is public if you put it out there for anyone to see then what do you expect? Sure copyright law prevents you from redistributing your works without express permission - but it doesn’t prevent others from using your works to inform themselves,…

Some of these arguments seem solid, but some seem kind of weak.

There are zero actual image files in the algorithm. The reason why pseudo-water marks sometimes appear in the output is probability. The engine knows it has seen those patterns in millions of photos so considers them “likely” additions to output in some cases.

If the best example she has of her ex's "bad behavior" is that he didn't want to wait a week to tell their teenagers about the divorce she'd already filed for, I don't know that she actually has a strong case.

That’s hilarious. The first time I ever laid eyes on Yellowstone it was right as the truck plowed into the motorcycles. I’ve since watched every second of Yellowstone. It’s the dumbest show I’ve ever enjoyed.

You mean like television, movies, or sports?

Congrats, mods! You’re protesting Reddit by...organically driving a bunch of traffic to look at pics of John Oliver. I’m sure the advertisers appreciate your efforts.

Or we can just use Celsius because Fahrenheit doesn’t make any sense.

See, for Celsius, I also use a poem: