Why is this remarkable? I bet over 90 percent of Korean films don’t have any non-Korean actors in them. Why are we celebrating movies that don't actively try to include more diversity?

I don’t know if it was THAT special, really. It wasn’t really 22 movies that told one long coherent story. It was 20 independent movies that, for the most part, put a stinger at the end to tease the next movie, instead of a sneak preview at the beginning of the movie.

Every now and then that kind of thing surfaces. “Life is Beautiful” I think had the same problem, and there was some weirdness about if “Beauty and the Beast” wins best picture, should it move out of the way to let some other movie win “Best Animated Picture.”

I can’t help but think that back in the early days of cable TV, Disney was a special subscription channel that you had to pay extra every month for to get their content. It didn’t last many years that way.

I’m glad your article ended the way it because....yeah, at the very least, submarines are NOT designed for wheelchair.

If a woman can play Dr Who or James Bond, why not?

It was the case of “Hey that woman they are introducing episode 4 looks just like the actress that got killed off in episode 1. Maybe she’s a sister or something.”

I found it confusing. With all of the introductions of characters, names and places,I assumed at that time that were were all talking about different people, with similar names. A simple “30 year prior” would’ve cleared up the confusion without spoiling anything.

I honestly DID think I skipped an episode. Yennifer spends an entire episode doing things to get on the court she very specifically wants to get. The very next episode I expect to see WHY that court is so special or what she does on that court. At which point, what happens is she offhandly mentions that she was on it…

And horses, and bards.

The biggest problem was that different timelines should look and feel like different timelines. And not just the exact same places with the same technology and same actors at their same age with just the dates filed off. Adding “10 years before the fall of Cina” or whatever at the start of a timeline in each episode…

I really can't think of a good way to do Howard the Duck unless you hire the people who are writing/running The Marvelous Mrs.  Maisel.

Galavant and agent Carter both ended just fine.

Considering that it was TFA that puts Luke in self-imposed exile away from all of his friends and leaves Leia's little rebellion to crumble with only a mcGuffin map left to "find him", I'm not sure how you can write Luke as anything but a disillusioned old man as a reason for his self-exile.

Actually, given Luke’s history of being lied to about his father, I'm really interested in why Luke (and to a lesser extent) Leia wouldn’t tell Rey about Palpatine. "Trust, it was much better that I found out when Vader told me."

I fail to see how having a character taking down an entire space fleet in an upper atmosphere battle with force lightning is respectful to the property and to character standpoints. Unless "being respectful" is shorthand for "it'll look cool and the transformer movies didn't have a budget for this."

“Rey who”

I just find it funny that you know there is someone who got paid 6 figures who argued "We better call this Star Trek:Picard because star trek fans will be very confused if it's just called Picard. Look at all the money lost on James Bond movies because they didn't start the title with James Bond Colon".

When cable first began, you were paying money with there promise that there would not be commercials.... It didn’t take long for that to change. Now due to competing streaming services, combined with the cost of producing your own content and the need to keep your monthly subscription costs down to something…

I find TNG to be pretty dated, but I pretty much love DS9 once you get past the first season.