Jon Stewart is fun as shit as a stand-up. Something he does that I like is give a bunch of punch-lines for a single situation/set-up… which isnt' unique at all except he always delivers what feels like the perfect number of punchlines.

"I mean, I wasn’t in Harry Potter, and I wasn’t in Lord Of The Rings, and I haven’t been in Game Of Thrones."

This makes me like Frank Darabont so much more.

I mean, it's obvious, but the astronauts clearly think they're on a different planet, so the audience does too.

Ooh, watch this too
https://twitter.com/McJesse…

Ooh, that's a good point. Pretend I also cited that in my comment above.

I'd argue that in a vacuum the cries that it's trying to incite violence are pretty silly… but Trump's constant work to undermine/degrade the media is fucking ridiculous and his supporters take coded language oddly seriously (covfefe)

She also retweeted this positive comment about how Gorsuch votes with Clarence Thomas 100% of the time:
https://twitter.com/bradcra…

The weird thing is she's replying to pro-Trump things. So that tweet specifically looks like she's chastising this guy for bad-mouthing Obama, actually… even though I don't believe she is because she points out that the Trumps are good people at the onset.

Yea, I think if they were a little more action-heavy and/or branched out more (thereby having replay value) they'd be worth the cost. I kind of half-enjoy those free samples they let you play to draw you in, understanding that I would never purchase unless they had a true gamechanger of a "choose your own adventure"…

Interesting, what value do you think he could provide as a source?

Because he apologized? The sequence of events is key here if CNN is to be believed:
1. They attempted to contact him
2. He removed all his posts and wrote a public apology on Reddit
3. He called CNN up and was like, "Please don't release my name"
4. CNN decided not to release his name, but published a story about the…

Sometimes the news becomes the news. That's not CNN's doing, that's the White House's shockingly adversarial relationship with the press.

They're not saying the "reserve the right to out this guy if he doesn't do what they want." They're saying, they did him a fucking favor by not doing exactly what they're in the right to do because he cried like a fucking baby and apologized when he found out they knew who he was. But if that crying is an act,…

How though? It's weird, there's all these allegations of blackmail… if CNN had just posted the guy's name without respective his privacy, nobody would have blinked twice. He's officially a person of interest once his username made the national news.

You can both be right. The "attempted to make contact" implies that they did not have a conversation. The user found out that CNN knew where he was, did some damage control, and THEN they talked.

Hahahah, what? That's hilarious!

I know about it but haven't watched it. I was more commenting on the wording of the headline, that implied that the SHOW found a new suspect and not the case.

"You can read the first 200 pages…"

"Hey, unless your a climatologist, keep your feelings about the conclusions of popular film An Inconvenient Truth to yourself!"