Let's see…
1. It's terrible
2. It's, like, so bad, man
3. Ugh, why does AVC have to ruin my life like this
4. Fuck this shit
5. It's on the SIDE instead of at the bottom!
Let's see…
1. It's terrible
2. It's, like, so bad, man
3. Ugh, why does AVC have to ruin my life like this
4. Fuck this shit
5. It's on the SIDE instead of at the bottom!
Hey, for people complaining about how bad the format is, it sure isn't making it much harder for you to flood every comment section with your incessant complaints.
Yea, but that's a pretty small community. I prefer the IMDb message boards.
I think if you click on a specific comment (the timecode) all the avatars magically load. It's weird.
Those are great words to use when you don't have substantive criticisms.
See, you say "terrible" and the process itself mostly seems the same to me? One advantage, I don't have to scroll up in order to reference the article in question. Although, most of us are kinda narcissists and would just rather type away about our own inane thoughts then read the content (myself included)…
I didn't say I like it. But there's a shit ton of kneejerk "OH MY GOD, IT'S DIFFERENT!" when literally at this point, that's all I can tell about it (although the "2 new comments" or whatever prompt that comes up seems to be broken).
It's a single click.
"Guys, the way we express ourselves after an article has changed slightly, so here's a link to a way that you can cut out the middle man and comment without even having to scroll past the article!"
Between this and the chair made of swords, I'm not entirely certain that George R. R. Martin isn't Paul Kos.
Oh, no! The comments changed. TIME TO CALL THE WAH-MBULANCE!
I still insist that the reason I'm so lukewarm on his last two films is the loss of Sally Menke, which doesn't bode well for any of his future output.
"I want to say he'll be fine… reminded me of cannibal holocaust… I might be a bad judge."
-Womp Thing
"But does the film say anything that 40 years of anti-war pictures haven’t already, or does it just say it louder and with monsters?"
I had the same reaction as you. Not to mention the fact that films with totally unique thesis statements are rare, if you can package that "louder and with monsters" you have a pretty…
To be fair, if it is aligned with "A day without women", that would make sense since women make up the majority of book sales.
I mean, he could. He's just the one that doesn't immediately align.
Yea, those are all pretty solid comparisons (the women as well), but then we're stuck with Craig Robinson as Col. Mustard, which is weird.
That's been my thinking. Even the middling reviews can't keep me away!
To be fair, Onur's kind of fine until he feels the need to defend Anne Heche.
To be fair, that line made me laugh.