I am expecting a $10.00 DLC pack where you can change your dog into a Pomeranian or a chihuahua.
Or Nintendo and Microsoft can get together, and you can transfer your now full grown Nintendogs to COD: Ghosts.

Nintendo? Pay them? I doubt it.
If they wanted EA games that bad then would've let EA run origin on their online servers like the original plan.
However with yesterdays' announcements being a complete flop, the WiiU and the PS4 are looking really good right now.
I don't know what happened behind closed doors, but it…

Even though I had no interest in buying the next Xbox anyway it still infuriates me that one (maybe even two if Sony goes through with it) of the big major companies decided that this was the right direction to go in despite an enormous amount of fans said that this is not what the gaming industry should come to.
At…

You forgot the dog Kirk.

Those people wouldn't buy a new copy anyway.
It's either they can't afford $60.00 a pop.
Or they aren't will to pay that much until they know the game is crap. You basically lost an entire market of people that will either just pirate it for free, or buy it on Steam for a phenomenally cheap price.

Nintendo barely does it?
Sure they do. The Wii could play GameCube games, the Nintendo DS systems up to DSi could play Gameboy Advance games, and the WiiU can play Wii games.
It's a money and space saver. You can freely discard your old system, knowing you can play the games you love on the new one.
If they don't make…

Yes.
It's a system where you install the game, and then it's linked to your account. It can only be played on YOUR linked account.
If you want to give it to a friend to try out or anything, they can't play it.

So what...Xbox one is a remote control, and a camera, and a console...yeah.
Oh, and they also restrict used games.
The very thing people told them not to do.
Shame really. I quite like the design. Enough to fancy the thought of buying it, along with a WiiU.
Guess I'll just stick to WiiU and PC.

Kotaku must really love taking a shit on the WiiU.
The only postive things they ever write about Nintendo is info on Pokemon (which they are always behind by weeks compared to the rest of the fans.), and Nintendo Directs. Which oddly enough are always put on the back burner so no one really cares about them.
But boy…

And again, what will be the difference? Assassins Creed by itself looked very good when it came out. It's third party company.
You can go on about technical improvement all day long. If the consumer can't see the difference, then you need another selling point. Also once again, how does frame rate really matter on a…

Those same developers were also the people who saw the WiiU before launched and gave it praise.
So again, what exactly is the problem. They complain about it having lack of power. Nintendo made WiiU much powerful then it's predecessor.
They complain that they have to utilize the tablet. Iwata said that devs don't have…

And that was what? Midnight or something?
That whole debacle went by in a whisper. I hardly even remembered they did such a thing.

It was optional, and it was meant for parents who wanted to limit how much time their kids spends in front of a television screen.

Nintendo has shown to be very adamant in what they say.

Yeah. I keep getting stuff about the Wii U. Not even a single Gamecube things pops out.

Pokemon aren't going to fix what isn't broken. The formula they have used for practically 18 years has garnered them big success, and still has. The only reason they are doing 3D is because the handheld is all about 3D. That's it.
People get more hyped about the monsters themselves and the new features then about the…

It was an article here on Kotaku.
I'm not saying Assassins Creed like the first game of the series, but like a demo shot of them utilizing the best features the PS4 at the moment has to offer.

What I'm trying to say is that Nintendo HAS been listening to the very 3rd party developers that are still whining their tits…

Also allow me to quote this:

That is far from a sad excuse. If anything it just shows how Gamefreak are intent on keeping the core values of their games.
They will never make a core Pokemon game for console. The man even said it himself. It doesn't match up with what he wants the game to be. Good on him. Too many developers lose sight of what…

I don't think you know just how close Nintendo and Gamefreak are.
The heads of those companies practically know each other from childhood. It's a very symbiotic relationship. And as far as Nintendo is concerned everything Gamefreak has done has reaped them buttloads of money. They aren't going to interfere with that.
Al…