doggybuns
doggybuns
doggybuns

I wouldn't call him useless. Just sheltered. As implied in the description, he escaped from the castle because he wanted to see what's really going on. I'm very certain that once he finds out what Ganon was doing to his kingdom he won't be so "useless' anymore.
Overall this is just the basic synopsis of the supposed

To be fair with Skyward Sword, you find out half way through the game that she no longer needs rescuing and is on her own quest to help out Link in the end of the game.

I saw this on Tumblr, and I must say I'm impressed.
It might never happen with a Nintendo game, but dammit this would make a great new IP. It's different enough for it to work.

I will watch this artist for more of their work. Really liking this stuff.

This is pointless.
Enjoy your IT.
Atleast you can like the endings as is.
I on the other hand will simply enjoy the past games, whilst headcannoning my own version of the endings.
Hope you have a nice rest of the day.

I'm very sure many fans have brought up very concise and valid reasons for disliking Electronic Arts.

What confuses me is that they were left to their own devices for their previous games also. So clearly the should know what to do and what not to do right? If that is the case then the only thing that changed in Bioware was their income of cash. Which means they couldn't be lost on how to properly make a game.

We aren't talking about Inception. You brought it up as a defense for Mass Effect, and I told you you are comparing two different genres here. The ending works for Inception because that was how the movie was from start to finish.
Mass Effect is not like Inception and had an Inception-esque ending. Doesn't work like

That...doesn't make sense to me.
With an even less budget then EA gave them, they were able to make a more in depth game with much more dialogue, choices, consequences, and content then ME3. How does giving them more money mean they not only shod off the most integral part of the game (which is the plot) and shoot it

Yeah. I said they added scenes into the endings like a couple of replies ago? Did you fully read my replies?

And I told you that Mass Effect wasn't about being subtle or anything like Inception.
It was about choices and the consequences for your actions. You did something good, bad, or neutral then you have to face the consequences of your actions.

That was the whole point of Mass Effect. I've played the games. I didn't miss

I've said it before and I'll say it again.
There is a very good reason why all the comics and novels of Mass Effect specifically exclude Commander Shepard and hardly ever reference the character. Including in actions. There is a reason why most of them involve characters that don't directly interact with the Commander

Don't buy first day. Wait for the reviews to come out. And not the official reviews either. We all know how EA paid IGN up the butt to give them stellar reviews for ME3. Wait for the bloggers and Youtube reviewers to offer an honest no money under the table review.
Besides First week sales are the most important to

Inception was meant to be vauge, with many unanswered questions that leaves the viewers up to you decide what happened.
Mass Effect was not. What you did is what you did.
You killed the Rachni, that was it. They are dead, and you have to confront the consequences of that. You didn't have half the fanbase questioning

That won't change anything.
Nintendo should of just ignored the whining from the hardcore fanbase when it came to their lack of M rated titles and do their own thing.
It's been a tug of war with pleasing fans that wouldn't put a dollar to their product and upkeeping their image as a family friendly product (like it's

What did you expect?

No. I clearly don't believe in the indoctrination theory.
I personally think it's huey and I want a clear explanation for the ending. Mass Effect is based on logic. Not vague details that may or may not be true.
If you believe in IT fine believe it. However don't try to force it on me as the factual ending. Because as

I sure ain't. Which is a shame really. I would've bought ME3 to get their Citadel DLC which was a very nostalgic and fan filled way to end what should of been a fantastic series to the end.

Yeah, and Mass Effect didn't do that.
They specifically said for years what the ending was and wasn't going to be and it blew up in their face.
Even if the IT was real it was still leave logical rifts that defy the world building Bioware created.
How did she activate the Crucible with his mind? That makes no sense. Even

But the staff itself literally debunked the whole IT theory for the ending.
I showed you the screenshot in the other discussion we are having.
We can speculate all they want, but the fact is- and Bioware said it themselves, is that there was no IT. Shepard wasn't under the influence of indoctrination. Every weird as

I just gave you the blasted screenshot of a forum post form one of the official staff members at Bioware and your asking me to show you a link?
Are you kidding me?
I can hardly remember what thread this post was under, yet alone the page number it was on along with if the thread even exists anymore or is buried by the