"I'd be curious if you still think this once you're fighting in a war, or have family fighting or dying in a war, because it's crystal clear you've never experienced it."
"I'd be curious if you still think this once you're fighting in a war, or have family fighting or dying in a war, because it's crystal clear you've never experienced it."
Is that somehow entirely new to you?
I do understand the lack of censorship, and I like curse words, but I prefer a sort of fig leaf to mask the ugliness. I'm sorry for the trouble that might cause you.
Take a look at the Korea for which we fought and the Korea that was preserved by the counter-American effort; make a value judgement as to the righteousness of that conflict; and consider the situation we'd have had we left the Soviet side to their ambitions and methods and then get back to me.
I strongly agreed.
So you're one of those people from the Wild World of Chomsky in which the Soviet Union and the attendant horrors didn't exist? In which Salafism doesn't exist?
WTF ️ is an anti-war message intended to accomplish? Further enfeeble the already peace-fetishizing First World? You're preaching to the f***ing choir, a**holes. Translate your s*** into Arabic, Urdu, or f***ing Korean, in which case it might—though not likely—do some f***ing good.
He's a "Star Wars superfan" and that doesn't tip anybody off that he's a f***ing dips**t?
How did you miss crediting Ben Mendelsohn for Bloodline, in which he was f***ing electric, or Jimmi Simpson for Zodiac?
He's f***ing horrible.
I call for a boycott of Tarantino because he's a f***ing hack in love with his own s****y dialogue who hasn't made a decent movie since Pulp Fiction.
If there's one location setting that I don't ever need to see for the rest of my life, it's F***ING Los Angeles. EVERY show, since the advent of color TV, has spun around those bland ugly hills and those dumb boulevards and stupid palm trees. That REALLY turned me off from the get-go.
You guys are really loose with your -isms. Almost none of those things matter in the slightest except that you feel that it might be an affront to your esteem.
By continuing to do as I like, perhaps, and not sparing a further second for trolls . . .
OK, next time, respecting the potential for obtuseness, I'll more clearly indicate the shift from facetiousness.
He shouldn't. He should just abandon this "Americans are SOOOOOO unaware" stuff, because there's little data to suggest that there's some keen, general sense of awareness elsewhere.
If that's not implicit, then what's the point to begin with? Would it be just as salient as "John Oliver loves highlighting humanity's generally poor sense of geography?"
Oliver needs to show how wonderfully other countries—like the U.K. perhaps—perform in geography to REALLY show us how stupid we are (I wonder why he doesn't do that…).
Not taking any f***ing chances…
Apparently, it's never f***ing FUNNY in Philadelphia because that show sucks d**ks of lip-splitting girth.