Your post (and most of the others in this thread) are missing the point here. No one is surprised that political operatives (especially campaign staff) are worried about the impact on the election/her choices to be elected.

“

• For a single person in the Boston area, a living wage that creates minimal economic security is $15.68/hr ($33,120 if working full time all year, about what they earn now.

• For a single person in the Boston area, a living wage that creates minimal economic security is $15.68/hr ($33,120 if working full time all year, about what they earn now.

For a single person in the Boston area, a living wage that creates minimal economic security is $15.68/hr ($33,120 if working full time all year, about what they earn now).

“Hillary and Bernie agree on 93% of things.” Is just completely idiotic, and shows that you aren’t really paying attention.

“I think she has a better chance of betting through some, any, progressive legislation through the Congress than Bernie did.”

I would pay many dollars to see Bartolo Colon try to play outfield.

Ah, I see. You’re more interested in trolling than discussion.

? Your comment has nothing to do with mine. Are you ignoring my point, or just don’t understand it?

This argument demonstrates a pretty clear misunderstanding of the actual policies supported by the neoliberal/Clintonian wing of the Democratic Party. They might be better than the Republicans, sure. But they sure as hell aren't progressives.

How is his agenda focused middle class white people? Essentially all you offer in your post is ad hominem reasoning: Bernie is from Vermont, Vermont is white, so Bernie only cares about whites. That’s not an argument.

Your memory is wrong. For example:

Rubio is likely the best defender in the NBA at his position, and easily a top-5 passer. That’s how he fits.