doctorsensible
DoctorSensible
doctorsensible

This is a horrible analogy. Eggs and flower would be eggs and sperm. I don’t care if you spew those all over the floor. But the batter has been made, the oven is on, and the damn thing is baking. Just because it hasn’t finished doesn’t mean it isn’t a tragedy to tear it apart.

And don’t forget that, statistically

Response to One: Sure, murder has a legal definition. The crux I assume you’re referencing being that it is the “unlawful” taking of another person’s life. And we do have instances of lawful killing in our society which you’ve listed out there, which we justify based on the purposeful actions of the party being

My apologies for the late reply. The “soul at conception” argument is worthless as we cannot even determine if you or I have souls, so I get why you may be frustrated with the argument. Moral value can be argued, but souls is a cop-out argument.

The “fix” usage is really to show that a statement shows that an article

Because in a contest of ideas and truth, people like Maza are grossly unprepared to do anything but look foolish.  

You’re kidding me, right? Maza regularly insults and lies about the other side to try and make his point, Crowder simply insults him back in responding and correcting his videos. Crowder also doesn’t make generalizations, Maza IS effeminate and lispy. You may not like Youtube’s decision, but all they really did was

I have zero problem with the practice of medicine. I have a problem with baby murder. Lots of terrible things can be done with the defense of “practicing medicine”, as Goebbels demonstrated. The difference seems pretty cut and dry to me. Do you have an actual argument for me, or is “You believe other people!” the sum

It’s an electric signal fluttering between cells for where a fully formed heart will eventually completely form.  If your case is that it is still a developing heart and that this makes murder a-okay in your book, I struggle to understand your morality.

You’re right, bodies are different than guns.  And you do not have the right to kill a baby’s body for your own convenience.  Why is it that the right to body autonomy only belongs to the person who created the second, which is completely innocent and helpless?  Seems pretty callous to me...

Even using your thought process, let’s say you’re on a ferry and the Captain decides that he would no longer like you to be on his ship... so he kicks you off in the middle of the river. You don’t know how to swim and you drown. And you think that the Captain can respond to the police “It’s not me fault ta man couldna

Higher education was affordable before government began to offer student loans to anyone to study anything. Remove them and watch prices fall. We should also reorganize to certification via online training, again reducing prices as colleges need to compete for people to attend more extensive education facilities.

You and I are also just clusters of cells whose ‘heartbeats’ are stimulated by electrical charges between some of those cells. You and I are still both alive, and I would very much advocate against your murder as any baby. Much of the horrors of history are caused by people who define humans by that which is

I am aware of the forums general stance, but I let morality and reason guide me, not condemnation from those who disagree with me. Even should the whole world stand against me, morals should not shift due to popular opinion or the company which one keeps.

Nope.  Do people who make gun laws need to own a gun?  Only people who own companies to vote on corporate tax rates?  Yours is a silly statement from someone who does not have an argument.  

A 6 week old fetus has its own heartbeat. It has its own DNA. It is absolutely alive and human, whether you want to define it as a baby or not. Purposefully taking the life of something human without consent is murder.

The Guttmacher Institute study is sloppily done. The Journal of Law and Economics (2004) had the best

To be perfectly fair to Rian Johnson, he only used his first draft to make The Last Jedi. Not that he couldn’t do more or was being pressured from anywhere, but this is what he decided to do. So laziness also appears to play a major factor as well, coupled with that dearth of skill so shocking it seems somehow

I feel like they’re still not getting it. This Terminator movie feels like a Sci-Fi graphics fest... when the best Terminator movies (1 & 2) were more like Horror movies with Sci-Fi elements. Big battle scenes do not sell this movie for me, an unstoppable juggernaut who will slowly and relentlessly wear you down is

1. “How do we make a teaser when we have almost zero footage of Patrick Stewart yet?”

A: Take a crew out to a vineyard for an afternoon, film whatever you can, and we’ll throw a voiceover and some graphics onto it, and we have some footage of Patrick Stewart waking up we’ll throw in at the end.

Not to be overly

I’m pretty sure competent storytelling would allow you to do just about anything with Star Wars.  It just won’t work with the garbage Kennedy has been shoveling us.

I read four and a half of those books before I quit (never got into the show, but followed how it ended). Those list of names he gave? I have zero remembrance of any of them. To be fair, I have little memory of a lot of the major names either. That’s part of the problem with his book, a lot of fluff and characters who