When someone publicly claims they were raped, odds are they probably were from what we know about the false rape accusation stats.

Yeah Hillary has a great record of believing claims of sexual assault victims....

Compulsive liars are not exactly unknown to mankind. If you’ve ever had a fantasist in your life, you come to recognize them.

So how does “believe, then investigate” work when the second you start posing questions you’re accused of being a rape apologist — or worse?

Wrongfully labeling someone a rapist, or any other type of criminal, simply because you’re hedging your bets(right turn of phrase?) is not ethical journalisim.

She 100% should not write again on this site after that crap. Then she gave such a non-apology (the kind they always rip on here) even though she was totally wrong and a huge ass in the process.

Hey I’d tread lightly with that, lest you be labeled a rape apologist.

You do know a rape didn’t occur, right? Someone is part of the problem here

Rape accusers should always be believed until it is proven not true.

You are literally apologizing for rape when you post this.

You’ll probably stay in the gray for obvious reasons but I love you.

Can’t take a single story of hers even remotely serious since then. Never forget.