dmerce1
Dmerce1
dmerce1
  • VW should buy back customer’s “clean diesels” at full price.

Tyler,

These are not the 72 virgins they were expecting.

Fun story about ice breakers: they are often dual hull designs (and ice breaking bow and keel on one end and an open water bow and keel on the other) because icebreaker hulls are terrible in open water so they are designed to turn around in open water and sail one way and then flip around completely when they get to

Because we have affordable fuel and constitutional rights?

So I don’t care about any of that.

I think the rest of the list is extremely possible. I’ll admit, when I saw GE was next I had to double check its position. I’m satisfied with where it’s at.

It seems that as well as being a genuinely nice guy. Jimmy Carter had a pretty great taste in the movies. The late 1970s a was a great era for American cinema

Scuttlebutt tell me that one of the 28 members took photos of Area 51 from their perch and disseminated them on the Internet, which really pissed off the Air Force, and that at least some of the current owning generation are right-wing loonies (to intelligence agencies, Oathkeepers are just as scary as lone wolf

My preferred method of Victorian transportation is private rail car moving full steam while scores of Chinamen lay track before my velvet-lined iron beast. As I roll by them, I’d toss white lilies on the bodies of the hardest workers from the etched glass window my dogsbody opened for me.

The whole “violent names” bit in regards to guns is part of the agenda, is disingenuous and immoral to keep the farce going as much as Gawker pushes the agenda for the left

Give it a rest, gawker. Yes, we get it; you’re afraid of guns and think that taking them away world solve all social woes.

Correct me if I’m wrong but aren’t “Barrett, Remington, Kimber, Ruger, Wesson, Browning, Benelli and Beretta” also names given to people?

We’re Gawker’s customers. Because of us, they exist. By doing “nothing”, we are only telling them that they should keep doing what they’re doing, because they have nothing to base it on. I read the article and made my comment because I like Gawker and want to let them know that, as a customer, I’m unhappy with these

Not tech related. Gizmodo, cut the nonsense. If you want to write about non-tech issues, find a different audience on another site. Keep your political opinions to yourself. I don’t come here for anything other than tech. Your writer’s opinions on anything else fall on deaf ears. I don’t go to tech experts to learn

Oh Gawd! Now brain-dead liberals are intimidated by names!
Somebody should get the government to ban them!
I’ll go start a petition on MoveOn.org....

Uhhhhh... People aren’t necessarily naming their kids after the brands Browning, Remington, Barrett, etc. Those brands are named after people. Its not like they’re naming the kid “New York Times” or “FaceBook”

My son TRD disaproves of your comment.