wow, so are we just in attack mode on Bernie right now? The only non-corporatist candidate in the field, AND the only democratic candidate who actually supported gay rights before it was cool?

how is josh gad still in movies?

All of my rugby friends swear by the 12oz warmup and theres some science to it. Alcohol does tend to relax the muscles

im sure theyre nice people, but the idea that gawker has enough journalistic integrity that its worth quitting over is just insane to me. It’s like a chef quitting Chili’s when the management refused a request to add a new menu item. This isn’t a real news site.

it seems that soccer is too!

That’s money we could have re-invested in our transit system...

you think someone on the campaign team is incapable of signing the “-H”?
Even under your theory the comms team could have run through 6 different versions of it, sent the final to HC who says, “yes” and then they post it. You think she does or says anything without measuring and calculating multiple times?

was he talking shit to the 4th official about it? As in, did he actually want a foul for that bullshit?

US Soccer may actually have the ballz to throw in on a boycott, but they wont be the first ones in

thats bc only shit leagues play in the summer

Well the Hobby Lobby opinion was based on a statute, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, so it can’t stand for the same. But as for the First Amendment, that is the question (Does it the freedom of association shield against a gov’t compulsion to issue marriage licenses). The answer is probably not.
But RFRA most…

I think you’re overthinking this. The First Amendment > CRA. It’s straightforward.

What you’re arguing is [their bullshit] =/= First-Amendmen- protected-conduct.

It may be just semantics to you but when you say they are wrong for believing the 1A > CRA you are missing the point

Clinton passed DOMA which is essentially the opposite of treating same sex couples equally.

Yea there’s been limited efforts (and they’ve only been recent) to change it. Not sure why youre surprised

Not sure if trolling or serious...But all constitutional amendments trump statutes. That’s the basic concept of judicial review. Kind of like how the 14th amendment trumped DOMA, etc.

The issue is just whats covered under the first amendment and what isn’t. If a certain type of speech or conduct is covered then YES ,it…

i dont think anyone legitimately argues that her medals should be taken away. What is the competitive edge? It’s completely different than a situation if a female competitor was trans-woman the whole time

“kick and run”? Surely the WWC would have no place for such a strategy. . .

i hate people who sincerely talk like this, but after seeing so many shitty lob goals from goalkeepers with no vertical leap, and plays like this it just makes me smh

wtf are you on about? you said “Protecting and serving poor communities does not necessarily mean harassing them.” I simply and pointing out that that’s not the fact, and Mosby knew this. It’s the “crack a few eggs” style of law enforcement that she was complicit in, and she is only now having to account for in this…

theres a reason we have a court system and due process. Its because police are always going to arrest more than just the guilty. If you order heightened police presence anywhere you ARE going to get more police harassment and more innocents arrested. Thats a fact and Mosby knew this