May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one.

Outvoted is “wrong” in America. And it has nothing to do with popular vote vs Electoral vote. That thread has been harried by losers since the 1800s. Your ethics (and mine), sadly, have nothing to do with it. I give you the Kardashians.

Indeed.

Trump WAS outvoted.

These are two separate issues. 1. The election - yes, the DNC decided in 2012 (see clinton’s emails) to put up a horrible candidate. The only one who could possibly lose to Donald Trump. Both the DNC and the RNC put up terrible candidates. For the sake of America, they need to figure that shit out better. 2. The…

Actually outvoted isn’t wrong — that’s why the outvoted still have representatives in the house. When either side wins *every* seat, the other side will be voiceless, but they’re not because they deserve their voice, because they’re not inherently wrong.

As opposed to the pseudo-fascist goons who forced the ACA on us?

If I believed cooperation was still possible, I’d be with you. But Democrats have had the olive branch shoved up their ass too many times in recent years to keep falling for that trick. Republicans are playing a zero-sum, zero-faith game, and it’s well past time the Dems caught up to that if we’re going to avoid…

What the hell are you talking about? You said “America” told us that we were “dead-ass” wrong. Considering more Americans told you the exact the same thing, what soul-searching are you engaged in?

America cast more votes for Hillary Clinton than Donald Trump.

I’m not sure that you can say his “ilk” were soundly repudiated when the majority of people voted against the winner. But there’s also the point that Snowden is held up as this visionary futurist, and in this case, he’s wrong. He’s a human being and that’s allowed, but the point of the article is disagreement that…

5 out of 43 presidents. Bleat bleat bleat.

and two of those times happened in the past 16 years...

What qualities and or experience indicate to you that Donald Trump, a duly elected President of the United States, is the person who is qualified enough to be spearheading our efforts to “combat the threat” of ISIS? This is a genuine question. I am not being sarcastic. I’m not asking in a mean spirited way. I am…

What’s your fucking point?

Can’t anyone just be wrong anymore? Do they also have to be a “fucking idiot”?

Yes, yes a million times yes. I recall when Obama was elected and the Republican Party decided immediately to work hand in hand with the duly elected President, and never worked to block anything of his in the past eight years. Liberals need to get their heads in the game and learn a thing or three from Republicans.

Cops kill more civilians by several orders of magnitude than ISIS. Cars kill more civilians by several orders of magnitude than ISIS in the U.S. Obesity kills more civilians by several orders of magnitude than ISIS in the U.S. Heroin kills more civilians by several orders of magnitude than ISIS in the U.S.. ISIS is…

Not wrong, but outvoted. Assuming that just because something is popular is right is fallacious.

I know right ? I was like whoa hold the attitude man. I just want the news article not your 2 cent about how the pizza taste. He’s probably one of those people that swear by giant floppy extremely chewy New York pizza and swear it is the best thing ever. Or rave about bacon or something.