diversitydan
DiversityDan
diversitydan

So do you consider all fan translations, edits or remixes to be theft? Or is just a problem when it happens to Nintendo? I say if someone has a the ability to get the game they wanted all the power to them. If Nintendo has a problem with it then maybe they will rethink some of their localization practices.

This is sweet and all, but I don’t get it. I have never found a game, movie, anime, comic or you name it more enjoyable; because the character and share the same gender. Hell, a lot of my favorite characters don’t share my gender or sexuality or race. Maybe I’m just odd.

Not taking the supposed victim’s word as gospel is not the same same as calling them a liar. Innocent until proven guilty is a human right and makes everyone equal under the eyes of the law. Should take the right away? Or only when it comes to rape cases?

:) Funny when I am called a SJW when I’m on most SJW blockbots. You could answer my question or state why Laura taking up basicly her fathers name is wrong from a story point of view. Or you can shout “SJW!” like it proves a point.

Depends on, characters you are talking about. Like take Miles Morales (Spider-man) he took over, after Peter Parker died in the Ultimate Universe. Laura is almost like a daughter taking over the family business.

Right. The article just explains the character a little and tells us that her boyfriend isn’t happy about her being reckless. Also that she got punched, which isn’t even a problem. I mean Logan once regenerated from a drop of blood in one story and if I’m right; her healing factor is better than his. (because she is

This is a nice example of anti-regressive left going crazy. Not every case of a woman or minority character being added into a story is an example of the “SJW-Menace!”. Some times it just makes sense. Can you name anyone more worthy to carry on Logan’s name than the woman he wanted to adopt as he own daughter. With a

Just to add to the convo. Spider-Woman is weaker physically than many other super heroes, and may be the weakest spider hero. She can only lift around seven tones, is slower than Silk and have no spider-sense once so ever.

The demand for a female Link goes back some time, the Zelda Wii U just reignited when people mistook Link for a girl. Either way, it still stands. The demand has been for a female incarnation of the Hero of Time or a female Link, not a completely new character. So where is this “just a female Link” complaint coming

Changing a controversial scene is one thing, but why cut something as PG-13 as petting game?

I don’t. Wasn’t Linkle made to fulfill a demand for a female version of Link that blew up around the announcement of Legend of Zelda WiiU? If Linkle is just another reincarnation of the Hero of Time, why should she be more than a female Link?

It’s one thing to not include a story in a game at all, cutting out at the story board step or what have you. It’s another to release a game than go back and cut out a part, because you are afraid of certain peoples reaction.

In a recent episode (We Need to Talk )in the UK they cut out a portion of a dance between Rose and Pearl. Just google “Steven Universe Censorship and Homophobic”

Maybe, it has something to do with the recent revelation on MSNBC that Trump supporters “Masterbate to Anime”. Twitch is obviously not wanting to cater to his bigoted base.

If you don’t fight for the topics you disagree with (in terms of censorship), don’t be surprised when you find it harder to fight for things you do. To me I find this censorship just as much as the Steven Universe edit made some time ago in the UK and will fight against both equally.

Who would have guessed that South Park would be on this list? I wonder why.