I can see it now. FOX News et al will have a field day with this, saying religious freedom is being curtailed, it's the end of religious freedom, those-damned-atheists, evil-activist-judges, ad nauseam.

I genuinely fear for my girlfriend. This *can't* be good for our relationship.

Jaguar related pussy jokes were old when Jalopnik posted that article last week. In fact, they were old 40 years ago. I'm not thirteen anymore, they're neither funny nor sexy.

I know little about the car, or the power band of the motor. I think when someone says you have to, quote, "beat on it," to produce power they're basically saying you have to rev the piss out of the thing. All the power and torque comes in at the higher rev range is what I imagine. To top it off, it seems the throttle…

The Universal Church of Steve Jobs, Reformed.

Don't read Jalopni....hold on!

In PMY, you might actually get crabs from this one.

Heartclick for you, good sir/ma'am.

Blade Runner.

When the piece of shit decides it runs, yes—total agreement. Mk IV's, especially, are just not well made cars. Nice looking, fun to drive, but not well made or even engineered in some aspects. They just break far too easy.

If you can manage it, down a couple of Habaneros. Maybe swallow them whole for maximum firepower.

I hate fox body mustangs. After seeing that video, I hate them a little less.

Instagram mentioned they were doing this like a year or so ago, so I'll take a wait and see approach.

Haven't read the article (saving it for later), but just a quick note to say I like the illustration and thanks for the link to Chris' work. Nice!

Hmmm. That looks like bird alright, but not the kind you, um, ingest at least.

I've met Howard Mook, who designed the Mustang II, and he's proud of it.

"There's no replacement for displacement."

I know there's a lot of hate for electric, but bear with me here.

This helps quite a bit. I never knew that pharma did such experiments. I don't at all doubt it, knowing the general history of that industry. It's a sad state of affairs.

I think you're confusing me with the original poster. I've said nothing racist at all. Please re-read my post and quote the offending portion.