Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    disqusywwmnun2ax--disqus
    Jim
    disqusywwmnun2ax--disqus

    It really isn't. Ironically, it's the diehards (of both the X-movies and just the comic book medium in general) who are making things needlessly complicated because they are too used to paying attention to the details. Nobody's fault really, but it's pretty clear that the FoX-Men has pretty much alienated a lot of

    Well that escalated quickly.

    It's actually interesting because until Apocalypse, a lot of people thought that Singer is the only one who actually gets the X-Men XD (not hardcore comic book fans obviously). So I can totally get why FOX basically keeps handing him the reins. All the X-Men movies he directed or had a hand in (though people like to

    And yet, you're complaining about me complaining about people who complain about a particular facet of a movie franchise. When will it ever end? :p

    We are receiving so many conflicting reports about the X-Men being a cohesive cinematic universe that I doubt FOX even knows what it wants. Noah Hawley himself insists that this is not part of the movie universe, yet Singer says the opposite. Deadpool's connection to the XCU was deliberately kept vague, as is the

    Lol that's what I meant. DOFP had continuity issues but, was for me at least, one of the best superhero movies ever.

    Complaining about continuity seems to have become the go-to, cool thing to say for people who hate the FoX-Men. It's getting tired. Continuity does not necessarily make for a good movie. Look at DOFP for example.

    Woah and here I thought people were excited about Ryan Reynolds as Deadpool, and the Deadpool movie in general.