There was a lot to look at in the prequels, sure. But they were cluttered, not rich. The visual hand here was clumsy, not deft. For an example of visually rich films, Greenaway or Gilliam would be a better examples.
There was a lot to look at in the prequels, sure. But they were cluttered, not rich. The visual hand here was clumsy, not deft. For an example of visually rich films, Greenaway or Gilliam would be a better examples.