Can I get a link to that public record?
BeetleJuice
disqusug3echu67q--disqus
Ad hominem?
Did I mention your name, or do you think that every adult journalist in the world is you?
It's not libel because was printed many times, despite the fact that it isn't true?
Who corrected them?
One of the letters of recommendation for his petition was written by his longtime mentor and priest, Jim Flavin.
Savage is kind of a strong word. It makes sense if he had destroyed his eye and makes a snappy headline, too. But if all he did was punch him, as reprehensible as that may be, savagely beaten is also a bit of stretch.
Printing that a man beat another man to near blindness when, in fact, he did not sounds like libel to me. Repeating that fact years later in order to impugn his character and cause financial harm? Yup.
If you have any interest in social justice, I would hope that you'd think the press should be held up to some kind of…
Who is to say he hasn't shown remorse. One interview from years ago? From people who pick and choose which "facts" they choose to present?
And an adult, in a position of authority, working as a journalist, who slanders said asshole gets off scott free?
I understand, you only have so much outrage and need to focus it on the right people.
Tell me more about how he beat a man to the point of blindness.
Just wanted to get your take on the press falsely accusing someone because they didn't bother to do more than the minimum amount of research. ;)
And who exactly is presenting these "facts" to the public?
That's just good journalism.
Worst apology ever.
I bet you do.
Kinky.
Popcorn?