Well, beans were a staple of the Israelites.
Yes, proceed.

Internal logic isn't always the same as verisimilitude. Twice the feather put up a force field around the bearer, but both of those times they were being physically assaulted against their will. It seems like the feather bestowed powers on the bearer, especially related to touch. Just because the preacher said it was…

As a vegetarian, I resemble that remark!

Just to get it clear, one of the definitions of a rape apology is stating that the accuser's recollection of the event appears to appears to be false because of logical discrepancies?

Just to get it straight, you have proven Genji's position on how famous criminals should get more flack for their lack of remorse to be false by bringing up what he said in an argument that has nothing to do with one? That's got to be a logical fallacy.

How much more awesome could a burger joint possibly make his life? How much more awesome could his youth outreach programs make at risks kids lives? Of course, I think that part of the pardon should involve restitution and an apology. I just think that being so hate-filled to the point that someone can never receive…

Cameron Esposito was right. Humor based on hate is the best kind of comedy. Although I think it would be funnier if it was a 16 year old beating him til he went blind in one eye.

I also agree that no one should ever be forgiven or seek redemption for things they did as a teenager.

You know, you used to be pretty funny. When was the last time you wrote a joke on here? All I see on you history is non stop complaining. Are you going through some tough times in life, seasonal affective disorder or something? It kind of sucks that you need to take it out on me.

What are you talking about? I changed Reddit to Youtube because I thought it was funnier?

How can you whine about getting banned from a site if you are banned from that site? By the way, are you addressing me, or just the internet in general? Using words like "you" and "your OWN" makes it seem like you might be implying that I am whining about gettting banned. I am a little confused.

why the fuck do you care so much that you need to make a comment to someone you barely know, on the internet no less, who was insulted once

Well, let's see, you were accusing me of being a liar just like some assholes are accusing them of being liars. You are victim blamer, plain and simple. Now let's see you go on and tell everyone on this article board that you think it is all right to blame the victim and call them a liar because they are accusing a…

Okay, let's do this again. Show me a quote. This is the fourth time you have falsely accused me without showing any proof. And just to save us some time, instead of showing a direct quote, you will try to change the subject, just like the last time you trolled me.

To point out the similar characteristics of how people respond to two different situations in order to show hypocrisy is not the same as equating the two situations. To attack someone based on what they "think" rather than the actual idea that was expressed, is a classic ad hominem.
On another note, how is that new…

Maybe they should give him a name that's half bill cosby and half charles bukowski to help them figure it out?

Seemed like kind of a weird bra choice to wear to a church. /notcomplaining

The real question is: will she give birth in an elevator of the back of a cab?

He obviously didn't suffer from predjudice from the state because he was there star witness. Hell, they even hooked him up with a pro-bono defense attorney.

I NEVER SAID THE TWO CASES WERE THE SAME. CLASSIC AD HOMINEM. YOU'VE DONE IT TWICE IN A ROW NOW.