disqusug3echu67q--disqus
BeetleJuice
disqusug3echu67q--disqus

I viewed neutral as a kind of druid thing. Allowing nature's law to take precedence and not trying to get in the middle. I may be looking at it the wrong way. I don't see it as balancing every good deed with a bad one.

You know, it's not just what he did that pisses me off, it's the reaction of the other commenters to it. I had people outright call me a liar for bringing up what happened. Simply because he is a beloved puppet, my word is not to be taken seriously and I get ganged up on and socially stigmatized. I suppose I must be

So that's your defense for a false accuser?

So you can go and falsely accuse someone, and then when they ask you to explain yourself, you don't have to because "don't feed the trolls"? Seems fair.
How are you supposed to seek redress without speaking up?

Bioexorcist.

If someone is hit by a drunk driver and gets injured because they aren't wearing their seatbelt, they need to take some personal responsibility. Obviously the drunk is to blame and should be punished accordingingly, but you can't go around saying that it's fine not to wear a seatbelt.

Cookie doesn't have the guts to back up what he does.

I wanna dip my balls in it!

I was really excited to see Kumail come back, but Jeff really makes the show tick. Kumail did make the gay lenscrafters joke about that, but is generally politically correct and just a genuine nice guy. Jeff isn't afraid to step up and get brutally honest, though he'll go too far sometimes.

I always apologize after giving someone an STID.

I have the weirdest bonado.

So I'm guessing more live shows?

True. But can you at least agree that CE's comedy comes from a place of hate? I mean, she literally just wrote that in the article. And in the the podcast, she said that one of the main defining characteristics of being a lesbian is thinking that men are terrible. It was meant to be funny, but it just seems like a

You heard the podcast? He does a lot better job than I did describing it. Personally, I thought it was uplifting.

A feud requires actions from both parties. I was simply stating what happened a few weeks ago. Putting words in mouth would be saying that I believe we are having a feud, not just simply accusing me of being involved in one. Big difference.

Close, I'm actually a focused, Non-Terminal Repeating Phantasm, or a Class 5 Full Roaming Vapor. And you are a sadistic piece of sh*t.

Cabbage.

I simply repeated what happened. Where in the hell do you get me characterizing anyone or calling anyone annoying? Is it required to falsely accuse people on this thread?
I mean, I wrote a transcript and you are telling me what my intentions are and how they are wrong. This is the definition of an ad hominem attack.

What's a sockpuppet?