And now you did it like a cool kid texting!

Striking that pose is a good idea when someone has just demonstrated why your wrong.

That's what you read into it, yes. That's what's there? Debatable.

See the troll game? You put "science" in quotation marks, so you have an out ("I don't consider that science"). Yup, they're there. Five of 'em. Disingenuous troll.

No, you literally did it. And I'm and English professor; I grasp the word's meaning.

You literally just proved you are guilty of what you accused me of.

The o.p. dares anyone to show how his sister specifically was lowering the bar. As the quote I provided shows, the email's author would not consider her specifically as lowering the bar, since he acknowledges exceptions to the data and the difference between an individual an a statistical generality.

No one would, including the author of the e-mail. But nice strawman. Did you read the email?

They are too far down the thread, and you aren't worth the time it would take, being a disingenuous troll. You saw them before, didn't comment on them, thus you clearly won't consider them.

You're playing troll games, like putting you claims in the negative, so you don't have to prove them (cuz you can't prove a negative).

Funny, you've backed up no claims yourself.

Says someone who clearly knows nothing about me.

Witty comeback! Bet you used to write for Three's Company.

See? You're a disingenuous troll, and you want me to take the time to provide research so you can dismissively reject it without demonstrating how it's wrong. Classic troll move.

Indeed it is. It amuses me that you don't believe it.

As, I said, others have done so, you didn't comment on them. And if I take the time to repost them, you won't read them. You will make a vague dismissive comment about them.

See what a disingenuous troll you're being?

Others have cited studies in this comments section.

Yes, there is.

See, you have to denigrate him because you have no tolerance for his argument. Done talking to you.