He probably does. But what interest do you have in respecting a viewpoint you don't share? Apparently none. There's lots of science to support what he's claiming, and he reiterates that ability should be the deciding factor in employment, not gender, race or anything else.

He literally says the opposite, but you are intolerant and choosing to demonize him, so…

He never says women are inferior. That is not his argument.

It made the specific point that inclusivity is important, individuals are different from statistics and that disagreement should not be used to dehumanize. It was very respectful. You are being very intolerant of him.

(No one should be fired for respectfully expressing an opinion.)

Your address is on it as the writer, that demonstrates responsibility. You think anyone in the company doesn't know who wrote it? One of the points he makes is that others have contacted him to say they agree but haven't the courage to say so publicly, so he's clearly taken responsibility for/ownership of what he…

Amazing theatre. New York can't compete with aesthetically. New York has become for vibrant theater what Las Vegas has for tasteful nudity.

The use of the conjunction "while," which indicates completely separate activities occurring for the separate categories. The o.p. would have included words like "also" or "additionally" if the point was both categories care for those things. The sentence construction clearly posits that one category cares about one…

Two trolls for the price of one? That block function is really useful.

He makes no claim to being a victim.

Funny, when someone like me points out Bill Nye isn't a scientist, the opposite argument is made.

I'm gonna let this go. I respect you, and I'm okay agreeing to disagree.

I should. I haven't. I'm an adjunct professor, not in primary or secondary school, though.

I can see that. I lived in a house with Microsoft people (almost all the non-Microsft housemates used Macs, which I found funny).

The troll comes out from under his bridge. Think it's time to block you.

Basically, you're saying you don't like what he says, so his argument is flimsy. That's far more flimsy than he's being.

Why?

Basically zero. But I've worked for managers/administrators all my life, and know what I don't like in them.

Which probably means you aren't any of those three things. He does hold the classical liberal position (don't discriminate based on gender, race, religion or sexuality). He does voice support for individualism (he acknowledges the myriad of exceptions based on individuals vs. groups). He utilizes logical thinking in…

I prefer Google's (I guess) policy to yours. No one should be afraid to speak their mind on a company issue. Ideas don't hurt people, and open discussion is better than resentful silence.