disqustqchfofl7t--disqus
A Olson
disqustqchfofl7t--disqus

The movie thought that the audience had an intense fascination with the mechanics of the drug. I remember some interminable car ride where not-Bourne was going on and on about it, and I was wondering why we needed to know this, especially since it wasn't particularly interesting.

They are big fans of Nixon's Madman theory, but they hated that it was an act.

Probably more like "revolutions have consequences." I can think of at least one revolution that worked….

Wait, you never made a new friend and showed them a bunch of stuff at your house? I don't think any of my friends were aliens, but I guess I'm not 100% sure.

So, you think that anyone who has different beliefs from you shouldn't have rights. You're literally a facist.

I can't say anything definitive, since the theater I saw it in was a bit dim and washed out (or maybe that was the master?,) but that would mark a big change from his past couple of films, which had exceedingly clearly shot action.

I totally thought that the crew did something to mess with Krall's species. The crew looked jovial in the video, so I didn't realize they had crash landed. I thought Starfleet might have covered it up, but in hindsight, that would be too much of a retread of the last movie.

Well, it's not like they flew their ships into the sun. I've always imagined that the robots would have done the brunt of the work of making the area they were in livable, and then it would be future generations that would eventually re-colonize the rest of the planet.

Man, no one want's Roddenberry's vision. This is the guy who demanded that there be zero interpersonal conflict.

It's because it's post-converted 3D, instead of being shot natively in the format. Basically, stay away from any 3D version in the right hand column of http://www.realorfake3d.com/ , although that doesn't mean that everything on the left is worth watching in 3D.

They've thought about it, and the answer is: "nah."

Hell, it's even worse than counter-productive, it's a damn NRA tactic. Their whole schtick is that there is no problems with guns, it's those "evil Hollywood movies" that are making people violent. (Let's ignore that these movies are wildly popular around the world, yet it's pretty much just America that has this gun

I mean, this is the same universe where Superman and Batman casually kill and/or brand people, and say things like "Do you bleed?," so comparing her to a friendly character in a happy-go-lucky universe by a different studio is a little odd.

That Back to the Future argument is stupid, since it deliberately ignores the fact Marty only plays the song because Chuck Berry invented it, so Chuck Berry is essentially inspiring himself. If it was a movie that takes place in the '50's without time travel and a white kid invents Chuck Berry's sound (similar to how

So, this is not the long awaited Jinx spin-off?

Well, first, there's no actual right to work. And, second, if this right did exist, they still wouldn't be violating it, since nobody is supposed to be making money on this, anyway.

They own Star Trek. That's not really in dispute. If people don't want to follow these rules, then it's as easy as not making their film set in the Star Trek universe. And because the people behind Axanar apparently thought it was perfectly fine to profit off of Star Trek (which they do not own,) then it is

Wait, what? The backstory is, like 70% of Reservoir Dogs. In fact, that's a pretty loose definition of backstory, since it impacts and is directly related to the story being told. It's not some random, unrelated events that may, or may not, have some impact on the character's disposition. It's like calling the

What are you talking about? It wasn’t given a huge budget. It was actually small for a game of its type. It had a small development team and limited development time. And being exclusive to Xbox and Origin only reduces risk, since Microsoft paid for a signifigant chunk of the marketing and development, and EA owns

They create their own boogie(wo)men. Anita Sarkeesian would still be a random nobody making YouTube videos that no one watched had they not gotten riled up over her.