It sounds like you barely have any idea what surf is. You can’t use movement keys to change momentum at all. You either hold 100% right or 100% left. So controllers would be horrible, since it’s practically impossible to do that consistently.

"There is, however, absolutely no evidence that anybody has lined up for any of the blockbuster genre stuff he's been in because he's been in it."

Uh, I'm pretty sure you're talking about Greg Grunberg, who is in practically every JJ Abrams project.

Stopping and asking what a probably delirious patient with a serious injury wants is a good way to get that patient killed.

Seriously? He prevents the nurse from calling Jimmy over the intercom before he leaves the building. His demeanor was flat and unaffected right after she calls Jimmy's name, when, before, he was crying like a baby. He even gave an annoyed "Well. Is that it?," portraying no emotion other than irritation. There was zero…

Where did they say they were the same? One option being better than another doesn't automatically make that option good.

Counterpoint: Tina Fey.

Maybe if all you care about are (some) social issues. Sanders wants to legalize marijuana, break up the banks, institute a federal $15 minimum wage, make all public college tuition free, replace Obamacare with single payer, expand social security, reinstate Glass-Stegal, opposes arming Syrian rebels, opposes a Syrian…

Atlantis, probably. I thought the attempt to be more "mature," clashed with the wacky sidekicks, and the other Disney movie clichés. Also, I like Mike Mignola's own stuff, but his designs merged with the Disney style rubbed me the wrong way.

The fact that Hitler and the Nazis outlawed socialism, and executed socialists and communists en masse, gives lie to your statement.

Actually, it isn't frame skipping, they just expose the film for a shorter period of time, which removes most of the motion blur.

Damn, those are some crypt keeper looking hands.

Movies based on Millar comics seem to turn out pretty differently every time (even Civil War seems to be no exception.)

When does he tackle a Christmas tree?

Eh, I doubt even he believes this. I think he just does whatever he thinks looks cool, and he doesn't want to admit it. Think about the part in the beginning where Superman blasts that guy through a couple of walls. Removed from its context, it's actually pretty funny. Put it back in context, and it makes no sense for…

Ra's destroyed the train's controls, which stuck it on full speed, and was fully prepared to commit suicide. Destroying the tracks only made sure that he didn't take everyone else down with him.

Ras was in a situation of his own making. He got on the train, put it full speed ahead, and destroyed the train's controls and was prepared to commit suicide. However you make of it morally (and Bruce reaps what he sows in The Dark Knight Rises,) he did not kill him. He certainly didn't mow people down with rockets…

The Lois subplot is a pointless time waster. Its only point is for Lois to learn that Lex knows Superman's identity (which, itself, is pointless,) after which, it is completely dropped and forgotten about. It's not necessary to frame Superman to turn public sentiment against him, the Metropolis incident already…

Then the whole bit is pointless. It's Kirk's death in Star Trek Into Darkness all over again.

I don't see it. Maybe during the interminable "slow motion with one woman wail" scenes in 300, but the rest of the time, wild, crazy shit is usually going down. I mean, he kills Lee Iacocca with a bullet through the bridge of his glasses in Watchmen.