Ghost Protocol and MI3 are neck and neck for me. GP's action and direction were absolutely aces, but it felt like they didn't even try with the plot. Everything to do with Jeremy Renner's character was boring, and I literally can't remember who the Villain was.

In case you don't know, Rogue Nation wasn't filmed in the IMAX 70MM format, unlike Ghost Protocol and Interstellar. So, while I'm sure the experience will be good, it won't have any incredibly clear scenes that fill the whole screen.

But, wasn't he still married in the end? Didn't his wife show up for like a minute in the final scene?

Actually, it was extremely easy to get a Oneplus One invite. I got one literally within an hour since I started looking last November.

I guess they're going for the Zero Dark Thirty crowd. (If I remember correctly, the December release was limited.)

The guy is the directorial version of Jai Courtney.

Let's not forget that even less fanatic sports fans routinely support and venerate terrible people. People rallying support behind Joe Paterno was more disgusting and harmful than any furry could be.

Who gives a shit? Those talents are completely meaningless.

That's a lazy reading. The Incredibles runs counter to Rand's message.

"stronger and functionally "better" "

It is fantastic. At least, until we get to the ridiculously happy ending where the kid is revealed to have survived being burned to a crisp. Before that, the film wasn't your usual Spielberg. He gets you to root for these characters to be assholes. Also, the scene where they're driving through the crowd of people is…

I don't see how Nolan in even trying to be like Kubrick. Their only similarity is their supposed cold, clinical approach to human emotions (even though I think that descriptor is bullshit, at least in regard to Nolan.) Oh, there were also some shots reminiscent of 2001 in Interstellar, but they're both realistic…

At least on the movie side, that's not true of Bruce Wayne from Nolan's Batman or Tony Stark from Iron Man.

Your projector must have been malfunctioning. There was no shakey cam in the film, and certainly not in the Hulk/Iron Man fight. The action was clearly shot through the majority of the film.

Yes, it's very, very hard to imagine that the TSA could do anything wrong.

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

It was really an Xavier movie. I mean, Wolverine was there as basically an audience surrogate, and he was taken out of the film pretty early during the final act.

What? The future half of Days of Future Past was the only part where he was ever a good guy. Otherwise, he was bad all the way through or an ally of convenience. Helping an ally purely to avoid death or exact revenge does not make one a good guy.

“then we have no basis for rational discussion on this topic,”

I wasn’t aware Siegel and Schuster wrote every piece of Superman media, ever. I guess there is no possible way that Superman could ever change the slightest bit since being created 78 years ago. And, obviously, christian writers could never turn Superman into a Christ allegory with super obvious Christ symbolism,…