disqust33xeduk7x--disqus
Davis
disqust33xeduk7x--disqus

"The Birth on an Erection"

The Twilight movies were pretty ridiculous in this fashion. The camera hovered just above the crotch of several young shirtless males. I think that was supposed to appeal to the teen audience?

Uh no, that's the exact opposite of how people describe The Young Pope.

"…a new movement: the #SwoleLeft, a group of weightlifters dedicated to intimidating right-wing bigots and white nationalists."

Some of the facts were unknown. What was known by everyone was that the Soviets were building missile launch sites so close to the American mainland that we wouldn't have gotten the slim 10-20 minute warning we expected from ICBMs launched from the USSR. And that the Kennedy administration was implementing an armed

It's true, Donald Trump was a Democrat who gladly accepted an invitation to Chelsea Clinton's wedding a few years back. He probably made more money as a reality TV star on a network that he now decries as hopelessly biased than he did as a businessman.

"Placebo Effect" is by far my favorite episode. I think some of the weakest episodes are the ones where they try to cram the entire cast in, with roughly equal time for each. Letting Archer, Lana, and one or two others share the majority of the time creates a stronger story. As much as I love the other characters,

I'd bet $50 that if you made the same movie with absolutely none of the CGI it would be a much better film.

There is nothing ethical about assaulting someone. There is nothing about the rest of your post that makes any sort of sense.

I appreciate this reply.

I'm not arguing for anyone to give him a platform. I'm arguing that he should not be prevented by violence from speaking at places where he has been invited. Which is quite the opposite from what a lot of people are advocating here.

I think Maher briefly touched on it when mentioning the part of the far left that's gone completely off the rails. He stands for everything from gun control, to abortion rights, to separation of church and state, to major restrictions on corporate abuses. If a quarter of the policies that Bill Maher supports were

Right so political violence that can directly result in the permanent silencing of someone. But not a ban, thanks for clarifying. Still fuzzy on the "abstract rights" though.

You don't seem to understand what "rights" are. You do not have any such freedom to assault people.

So you're saying you'd support an actual ban on Milo, and probably many other people's rights to speak.

The ACLU literally did this with literal Nazis. Milo is literally not a Nazi. Call him a bigot or whatever, but Nazism is far different and you are undermining the danger of it by rampantly slinging the term around.

Well the Civil Rights Movement, gay rights movement, Vietnam War protests, education on evolution comes to mind. You're probably saying to yourself "those weren't horrible people." That's entirely the point. To the people who opposed things like Civil Rights black people were horrible people. They were lesser humans

Great job turning an insult you made back on the guy you insulted!

I'm glad Wilmore took Milo to task in the way that he did. For people criticizing Maher, I don't know what people expected, a Tucker Carlson-type attack where the host just steam rolls the guest? I'd much rather see people defeated through debate, than in an "interview" that just involves the host berating the guest.

Am I misinterpreting your response or are you actually suggesting that what matters is not the principle of free speech, but the correct determination of what types of speech are acceptable? Because that's exactly the point, mine and the 1st Amendment's. On some level you have to either come the realization or dismiss