>I don't know where "sane" Ted Cruz attends church >

>This is the man that Ted Cruz thinks we need more of in the U.S. Senate: an unapologetic white supremacist.>

>See kids? Isn't associating people with racial demagogues fun?>

>Sorry, thought you were quoting Malcolm X-though I think Reverend Wright may have been?>

>And yet the director and author seemed to have failed catastrophically at conveying their intent to audiences.>

>Trump has a very, very slim chance of becoming President.>

>Please, Barack Obama is like a black Al Gore. Malcolm X would be turning over in his grave if he heard anyone say that he was a spiritual adviser to Obama.>

I'm pretty sure that my interpretation of the film is much closer to the director and author's intent than your's.

I was a drifter (no indication that he was homeless) because he wanted to see, first hand, how humans lived.

>>To quote President Obama's "Spiritual Adviser" - "dah chicken's are comin' hoooooooooooooooommmmmmmmme to roost!>>

Or fairly. Let the conversation go on to determine who is correct.

>wut? Snyder's Superman is one of the most passive, reactive protagonists I've seen in a major film.>

>Because Superman and Batman are not the same character, and the reaction to the portrayal of one does not in any way relate to the reaction to the portrayal of the other?>

2016 is the year that Christians, the Middle Class, Conservatives and Whites got fed up with being called "idiots."

Not an unfair comparison.

>So how far back does this criticism-proof shield go? A week of work? A month of work? A year of work? Or is it the hours? If it had only been 99 hour weeks, would criticism be okay?>

I don't care how rich you are, nobody likes having three years works trashed unfairly.

Why is it that fanboys worshiped Nolan's nihilistic, empty Batman trilogy, but are repulsed by Snyder creating a Superman who has to fight to live morally?

Filmmakers are upset because a project that they invelsted years of their lives on, often working hundred hour weeks, is dismissed by guys with pasty faces who invested two and a half hours on the film (if they sat through the whole thing.)

Heck, Fred Astaire films were considered wastes of time by the critics in the day. (In the 30s, a tap dancing man in the tux was shorthand for cartoonists to show how decadant Hollywood had become.)