disqusso84zdw85n--disqus
seven-deuce
disqusso84zdw85n--disqus

This film is clearly a table setter for the Justice League movie - DC's answer to The Avengers. So, basically, they better not f*ck this one up.

Say what you will about the Hobbit films but the Lord of the Rings extended cuts are f*cking marvelous.

Counterpoint: I can remember Starship Troopers getting booed pretty heavily at the premiere for Star Wars: Special Edition.

Wait for the blu ray (because you totally aren't going to pirate this, amirite?).

Superman has killed before in the comics. As a matter of fact, he's killed Zod in both the comics AND Superman 2 (though people conveniently give that a pass).

This formula is clearly outmoded in today's film world (see, MCU).

What if you actually like Zach Snyder?

Can we at least watch the movie before condemning Eisenberg's performance?

Psst… not everyone feels the way you do about the current crop of DC films nor Snyder.

So when did complaining about the length of movies longer than 2 hours become a thing? Or is there an objective reason why comic book movies should be entirely brief affairs?

I just can't get over the "Just Can't Get Enough" riff.

This. A thousand times this.

Rises is horribly underrated but damn, I thought McConaughey was the highlight of Interstellar. Also, Eyes Wide Shut , while arguably being one Kubrick's weaker films is still pretty gripping and bears closer inspection.

Inception is brilliant.

Heresy indeed. Great movie but not his best.

So because someone is pointing out a grammatical distinction they didn't "take away" anything from the article? Nice straw man.

Sometimes the art and the persona are irrevocably intertwined.

I found it useful.

No one is suggesting that a pedophile is any more or less horrific than a hebephile. But fair enough — if you feel those who take the time to correct the distinction between the two are somehow sinister, so be it.

Your quibble was with the word "hebephile" - the grammatically accurate description of Mr. Humbert in Lolita. The implication was that you take "vaguely suspicious" issue with someone who points ("harps", rather - something that the OP was NOT doing) to the distinction between "pedophile" (prepubescent) and