Yeah, when you count his feature films and his EP credits on TV shows, he's definitely above .500.

Really? I watched that, too, and I thought he came across as an asshole.

Apologies, but that just fit very well and was just vague enough.

Does he? What's the point of telling someone they're ugly?

I like that when presented with a choice of being nice or being mean, you chose the latter. It's a bold choice.

To change the headline would look they were attempting a retcon. It wouldn't necessarily be ethical to switch what you wrote to the opposite because then it would look like you're hiding your mistake.

"Everyone is always innocent until proven guilty."

Or someone is going to be guilty and not suffer from an actual real life trial by jury, and then hopefully the public opinion can do some good.

They both suck and they deserve each other.

She was in the opening sequence.

No, it's not that bad, I'm just a fan of Dave so I noticed it.

You just made me Google this movie because I thought 'woah Dave Eggers the novelist directed a movie and it's a horror movie?'

Why would we do that when they're a good-looking bunch with a strong fashion sense?

Screw the mythology. Give me 6 MotWs.

Except he's two different people dating the same person at a party.

Actually it's the previous sentence.

She's innocent.

The one about Richie's implosion, as opposed to the one about the debauched industry.

Yeah, you don't want to do it to a good show, then you'd be paying attention to what's happening.

With Inherent Vice and now this I wonder if Josh Brolin is concerned about getting type-cast in early-calendar-year-released kidnapping/crime comedies set in Los Angeles.