So, Avery understands to ditch evidence but doesn't wipe off his own blood in the most open and easy to see places? The blood had to be planted.

I've read people claiming to have insider information in lots of the comments. All sorts of allegations that seem a bit ridiculous.

This person is just a troll. Look at the comments. In one article he was commenting how KKK is a wonderful and nice movement. All just trolling stuff.

Attorney Ken Kratz

He is in enough demand that he can avoid Superhero movies.

The dude loved the media so much that he seemed like a movie character. Even when he is called for a witness and he on the stand, he keeps smiling and bringing up the media.

What state do you reside in?

One might think that. But animal cruelty is a sadly common thing. Look at Michael Vick. He never raped and murdered women. It's hard for people like us to comment on why someone would do such things, but you just can't jump to conclusions. I don't know if it's some hidden evil or something else. Remember people with…

You honestly think killing a cat means it's okay to be put in prison for 18 years for a rape you did not commit and being framed for murder? I'm not saying you don't have a point. I was also shocked at the cruelty of Steven to do such a thing. And it made me question him from the beginning. But the events are not…

I think there is a lot of proof the evidence was planted.

You can't really say the kid is innocent but Avery is guilty, because the kid is his alibi. And I agree. This kid is far too dumb to keep up the lie. And everytime he is allowed to tell the truth, meaning he is not being coerced by cops, he maintains a single story. He seems to be telling the truth.

This isn't just about Steven Avery. This is about our criminal justice system condoning the mass planting of evidence and the obvious framing of a man. You don't have to like him to be horrified and disgusted this sort of thing happens in America.

If Avery actually did do it, there would be no reason to have to plant so much evidence. They would work with the crime scene they found instead of weakening their own case by going hog wild with planting evidence. If he did it, there would be a ton of physical evidence. There is absolutely nothing, however.

Well, if they were all well adjusted nice mid westerners there wouldn't really be any reason to watch would it.

I believe you these cops are stupid. But Avery has an IQ of 70. He's even slower than them. If he did this, there would be tons of physical evidence. Instead there is a complete lack of any physical evidence other than what was planted.

Well, I think that person means credible evidence when they say evidence.

The cops definitely almost 100% framed Avery. That is not the unknown. The the thing we don't know is, did someone else kill her and the cops decided to frame Avery? Or did the cops themselves kill her?

Lol, I didn't say Steven Avery and Adnan Syed are the same. Perhaps read before jumping to outrage?

I was also hoping Obama would see this and perhaps intervene, but thats obviously very unlikely.

Well, perhaps you're right. Maybe the cops shouldn't be the main suspects, but I do find it believable they would do this.