You spend your free time demeaning people on the internet for your amusement. I spend my free time seeking a higher form of discourse, which sometimes includes exposing the flaws of trolling. I doubt you'd be participating if you weren't getting anything out of it, and I'm enjoying myself quite a bit. I type very…

Looks like we are at an impasse. I dont agree with any of the qualities you just described, and I am quite conservative in my views.

I'm pretty conservative, and I have no problem paying taxes into social programs that allow people to invest in their own advancement.

I see what you did there - baiting to engage in the age-old "jocks vs. nerds" false dichotomy, since clearly race has shown to be a losing battle for you.

Whats great about your response here is it really highlights one fact that people need to recognize in the civil discourse. I think if everyone who reads comments on the internet remembered this, we wouldn't have the division we have today.

You've already proven your point. We understand that you have no interest in hearing the perspectives of others, and nothing of merit to contribute.

I didn't know one way or the other, so I figured I'd hedge my bets to cover both of the most likely scenarios.

No. South Park's shtick is that they are all bad, so fuck it let's not even bother trying to fix it and laugh while it all burns.

What does disenfranchisement mean to you?

Mad Libs time!

I'm 37.

Evans' rebuff was exactly how Americans should be participating in the civil discourse. No hate. No anger. Just an appeal be better by taking a larger perspective on the issue.

I see what you did there.