Not great, and on the decline. Three storylines: the most interesting, a young man slowly becoming a drug dealer, is the best, but shoots itself in the foot at least once an episode with him acting uncharacteristically dumb to advance the plot. The middle one, about a CIA officer helping the Contras, has had flashes…

I'd wait. Reviews too harsh for first 3, they at least held promise, despite flaws. This 4th, tho, a "C" is too kind. Undid all the good will I had built up

Teddy was the weak link for me, until his final scene. Even a bad CIA agent should be a better undercover operative—doesn't have to be Michael Weston or Phillip Jennings, but come on. Things improved with coke dealer guy.

Was there in 1990. Now wonder if the American tour guide we were given had an affair with an undercover spy then had to be flown out in the middle of the night.

The main storyline, a Mad Max take on the Monkey King or something, is boring, trite and poorly acted. But the world-building is fun and effective, and a lot of the supporting actors supporting that world are fun, in a scenery-chewing way. And the fights are second to none.

Kind of forgotten, but I thought the subtext early on was his relationship with wife/son went downhill because he gave up years of his life undercover to put f'n Illinois nazis in jail. A good guy who loves his country and does the right thing, but that costs him his personal life.

My friend was a pilot for Hooters Air before I met her. She doesn't like to discuss it much.

Every Hooters in Orlando attracts so many kids that it always feels (and sounds) like a Chuck E. Cheese. Can't remember the last time I was in one that didn't have at least one preteen kid's birthday going on, complete with "I <3 Hooters" balloons.

Played Sea World earlier this year. Friends worked the show. It was a train wreck.

According to the book, the guy who INVENTED jury consultation offered his services pro bono. Clark basically ignored his advice, went with her "gut." I do think the case was lost before testimony began, but that's largely Clark's fault.

Toobin seems to think the same, to the extent I wonder if Scheck is a source. One character in book who comes out golden.