disquspucblq33nq--disqus
Bob Ross
disquspucblq33nq--disqus

I agree with many other posters. I am surprised, but I actually like
"Supergirl", but having superman in it is the weakest part of it. They
should have made this its own universe without superman. It goes
against superman being the last person from his planet and gives her a
pointless inferiority complex on the

I agree with many other posters. I am surprised, but I actually like "Supergirl", but having superman in it is the weakest part of it. They should have made this its own universe without superman. It goes against superman being the last person from his planet and gives her a pointless inferiority complex on the

I agree they need to jettison the "origin" thing in any new movie. Just like Spiderman, people know it now who will watch the movie. They should just get with a story and forget it. In FF, the origin story is actually pretty weak, I agree. There is nothing compelling about it at all. In the very first movie, I

yep. I do think he is the weak link in people liking it. They are indeed "goofy" and they tried to do a more lighthearted movie in the Jessica Alba ones to match that tone, and people didn't like it. But I feel they actually did as well as you could with such goofy powers and being a lighter movie actually fit for

agree. I believe they really have to start from scratch with the four main characters. The only one that was competently done was the Thing in the movies, but they all have to be compelling.

I thought of that, sorry for not including it. But the problem with Galactus is the problem they had in the Alba sequel..how to really convey that in a way that does not seem eye rolling? A big gigantic person bigger than a planet really would seem ridiculous in 2015.

There maybe a good Fantastic Four movie to be made someday, but no one has really discovered how to do it yet. The problem is the characters are not very interesting and they really only have one villain anyone knows (Dr. Doom), and it has been done to death in all three movies. Great casting or acting will not make

I agree with another reviewer on another site. It was lose/lose. If he was dead, than everyone would be just as mad having an original character die in such a random, pointless manner. There was no upside to it at all, and they badly misplayed this plot twist by not seeing that. I think showing him screaming while

Yes, even the "B" story about Enid was pretty poor. She chose to leave because she realized the place was not safe. In fact, when she sees the zombies surrounding it, it is actually further confirmation of that fact. I am not saying her decision was a good one, but Glen basically forcing her back seems inconsistent

agree, lack of guns seems to be this show's "zombies exist", you just have to not think about it, but the lack of armor is a valid criticism.

Interesting point about the armor, or lack of it. Warriors and soldiers stopped wearing armor specifically because of firearms. They could not really stop a bullet and the weight and inflexibility of it made it pointless and a liability. If guns are banned (and something happened so awful that even the most evil

then why are the gathered around Alexandria now?

I watched both the episodes and this is intriguing but I agree the whole plot is rather thin at this point. The fight scenes are great, it looks great and the atmosphere is great, but they really have not explained this world yet, why Sunny wants out, why they would not know there is a world not in the "badlands" to

As I said I am not repeating my original post. Re-read please.

its bad storytelling, I am not repeating myself. No one is mad he is alive, He is a fan favorite. Its the situation they put him in and how he survived. It is implausible under the rules of the story. Re-read everyone's complaints please.

The whole Glen thing was pretty much a disaster. I think they knew it as they had Mr. Yuen address the fans in a taped special even in "Into the Badlands" and you could tell they really were concerned it did not turn out the way they thought. Gimple's explanation on The Talking Dead sounds good when you don't think

This writer seems to put everything into a political lens, and his reviews seem to imply that the fact that some of his comedy is "un-pc" is reason in itself to hate it. In comedies, the only test is if something is funny. If they can make cross-dressing funny in 2015, then a movie should feel free to go for it.

exactly, they are disguised ads for touristy spots that play up being "spooky" to get a certain type of customer.

Another thing I am starting to wonder..do the zombies just "live" (you know what I mean) forever? If they just sit there for years with no food and are to incapacitated to move like these were, wouldn't even a virus "die" eventually?

agree and this hasn't been mentioned at all, probably because we know nothing about them. They seemed to lose them pretty easily.