Last month she did an interview with Collider where she sounded pretty open to the idea:

Neville destroys Voldemort's final Horcrux, doesn't he? So in a way, he is (partly) responsible for Voldemort's downfall, because when Voldemort loses the duel, he has no more Horcruxes to draw from.

Naomi Misora was okay- I could see her role being expanded so she joins L's team (apparently she was more prominent in the Japanese movies).

IMDB says it's Marc Warren (assuming 'The Gentleman' is short for 'the gentleman with the thistle-down hair')

I'm guessing the jump was because the first game established that Barbara Gordon was already Oracle. In City they probably figured it would make more sense for Dick to be Nightwing and Tim to be Robin. (I think with Asylum they were more or less in continuity with the comics. Obviously the New 52 came along and…

Catwoman again, I think. They've changed her face a bit though, and toned down the eyeshadow.

Isn't the Ultimate Spider-Man TV show about Peter Parker though? (Unless you mean when Miles appeared in the Spider-verse episodes)

Andrew Garfield seemed pretty interested in the idea of having his last Spider-Man movie feature Peter passing the torch onto Miles. It would have been kind of cool if they'd managed to do that. They could always write it so that Peter loses his powers (or his powers are transferred into Miles). Peter could get a…

From what I can tell, there hasn't been a wide consensus on some criticisms. I've seen some reviewers argue that some of the Avengers are poorly utilized, while other reviewers have said that they all get a fair share of the spotlight. Several reviews have also said that the storyline is a jumbled mess at times,…

It's very subjective, rather than something clear-cut like 'crime procedural'. One person might find the cameos distracting, another person might think that they're harmless, or serve a greater purpose in the story. Somebody who's never read the comics might have a different opinion to somebody who's aware that these…

I don't mind Ice King, but he really needs interesting/ funny characters around him if he's going to be the main focus. Apart from the wizard and the penguins, who were absent for most of it, this episode didn't have that. The furniture characters weren't that funny or interesting. (Side-note: Did the lamp look weird…

I'd imagine that's why Elsa and Anna share so many similarities with Rapunzel (though, their noses and chins are a lot smaller)- because Disney knew that kind of design was well-recieved. There's also the fact that the company still has a lot of Glen Keane influences in its designs.

Yeah, I'm not really a fan of the way they seem to have chosen examples. There's really no reason to include characters like the villain from Ratatouille if you're not going to include any female villains in the other comparison (or Colette for that matter). If you're going to include side characters in the male box,…

Hell, Dreamworks sometimes releases as many as three films a year, but in the space of 29 films (I'm ignoring the Aardman ones), they've only had two films with a female protagonist (maybe three if you're feeling particularly generous towards The Croods). Weirdly, both of them involve aliens (Monsters vs Aliens, and…

It seems kind of like cheating to include two male characters from Ratatouille (including the villain), and then leave out Colette. (It also seems a little odd to leave out Riley, the main character of Inside Out, but oh well) And just generally taking a bunch of pictures from different angles and tracing the chin and…

I'm basing this on this interview:

I'm pretty sure she said she'd always envisioned Harry as a male character.

The Hunger Games is clear enough in its influences- the Roman empire, gladiators, reality TV- that it's fairly easy to see how somebody could have come up with the idea without ever having read/ seen Battle Royale.

I thought the Mary Lambert-only version was released like, a year after 'Same Love'. It wasn't a sample or anything, she sang the chorus specifically for that song, then extended it into a new song afterwards. The Mary Lambert-only version's got more of a romantic tone to it, which is quite nice.

I've heard comments that the published versions contain errors the original didn't have.