Not to mention the "evidence" was found by the same officer that kept him in jail 8 years longer than necessary by withholding evidence that would've freed him from the original offense. You are ignorant if you actually believe he murdered her.

Why was the key not found the first day of the investigation but on the third, and why was it clean of her DNA but only had his. And why wouldn't he dispose of the evidence aka crush the car instead leaving it on his property loss let covered with branches. Please, your argument is weak. Get a brain for Christs sake.