I had a fan-wank earlier. Good times.

He has asked her to plant cameras. Reprehensible. DTMFA.
He has not raped anyone or done any of the myriad things Dan or anyone else said here.
His only option is to watch voyeur internet porn. Dan didn't even mention this.

Are you being serious? Genuinely I can't tell.

Hey, thanks. ^^
Great testicles btw.

Yup your medication may be at play here. The fact that you notice how you should, or would have in the past, be feeling (while not feeling it) is a sure sign.
It's an unfortunate side effect of the medication but a necessary one I would say. And, yes this has happened to me.
Wishing you all the best.

Ok, first paragraph. Nonsense. It's isn't rape. You can compare it, compare away. It's not rape.
Second paragraph. He hasn't done anything. No crime has been committed.
Third paragraph. If she's gonna stay she needs to be certain this has been dealt with and that he has an outlet - porn.

That joke left a bad taste in my mouth. 💩

Presumably we can all agree that she shouldn't do it and that this is a DTMFA situation.
I don't think degrading women is necessarily a part of his kink, sorry. This is another straw man after we just got rid of the rape one.

You are adding rape to the conversation. There is no need. It has nothing to do with voyeurism. Stick to the subject.
The man has not filmed anybody. He may want to, but he hasn't. No imaginary lines have been crossed.
Why would you think he will do it no matter what she says. When did that become a thing? This is the…

I thought the response was terrible whereas the advice ie. dump him was ok.
1) Dan adds that the guy may be into or will be into other seriously dodgy stuff. I really don't like that. Stick to the voyeurism withought imagining up new things.
2) It's a glaring omission to not suggest this guy should watch voyeurism porn…

It was destructive recovery who introduced rape into the conversation and you ran with it.
I said 'equating voyeurism to some unnamed escalation isn't helping anyone' and 'Throwing in new things on top of the voyeurism is not helpful.'

This. It's Devine intervention.

Is that in response to me? If so, god knows how you gleamed that from what I said.
There's no need to dial everything up to rape. We can discuss the man's intention to coerce his partner into illegally filming (rape!) innocent naked people (women!) without resorting to hyperbole surley (traumatize!)

It's not rape. Throwing in new things on top of the voyeurism is not helpful.
What does crossed a line mean? He's at a critical juncture which his partner is now aware of and can intervene before he hurts anybody.
Internet porn is the perfect outlet for his desires. It's free, legal and caters directly to his kink.

Yeah if you're in love with someone (and even if not) I don't see how this would matter either. You'd be supportive, right?

If your feeling genuine despair when following the news/politics then stop reading/watching that stuff. Filling your head with distressing info that you can in no way affect may be too much for you and bad for your mental health. Take care.

I gotta say this letter screamed fake but as always the advice may be helpful to someone out there.

Re: Lovecast
Terrible response to the lady with the potentially voyeur partner. I get that Dan and Nancy are trying to shock the caller into in/action but equating voyeurism to some unnamed escalation isn't helping anyone.
Why not address the elephant in the room directly? The internet. The guy can see all the stuff he…

You've met gay men, yes?

Did you not understand what Cynthia's runway fall was all about? Really?