She still used the reference because she didn't know the affiliation of the politicians she was writing about so no matter how she did it, she failed. Next time I comment I'll be sure to send you a formal request for your standards and practices spec sheet. That is the best I can offer you in the way of ensuring none…

Writing an article about politicians and not knowing their political affiliation is just as stupid as it would have been to mistakenly say, "The trio adopted the logo of noted conservative organization Nine Inch Nails". Whether her mistake was not knowing the band or it was not knowng the politicians or both doesn't…

Way to edit the article without noting the edit. You removed "conservative band, Nine Inch Nails."

Calm down? I dunno where I got serious there. The all caps, that was hypothetically you speaking. You've started off both comments with a 'fuck', and I'm the one who needs to come down? Lol. You're adorable, sweet pea! Have a lovely day! Thanks for the advice!

Nor are Nine Inch Nails a conservative band. Did you notice the onion at the bottom of the page? Don't recognize satire? Good job by you, Andy! ;)

How did your point go from "not sure if it's relevant" to "a huge fucking deal" in one sentence? Why in the world would you want to ruin the party? Have you understandings the satires? They called Nine Inch Nails a "conservative band." This can't be serious.

Best part - "The trio adopted the logo of noted conservative organization Nine Inch Nails."

"That's my logo. Did you think I wouldn't recognize this compromise? No, you can't take that away from me." ~TR