Yeah, he is placing a breadcrumb trail out for Samwell, he knows that the institution he is a part of is broken and archaic. He knows that there is a greater story going on. Otherwise his character is pretty pointless.
Yeah, he is placing a breadcrumb trail out for Samwell, he knows that the institution he is a part of is broken and archaic. He knows that there is a greater story going on. Otherwise his character is pretty pointless.
The reviews on here are usually duller than the worst episodes of the show, in that they grind the same axe each week; the easiest criticism of any post apocalyptic genre show / story is that it is innately running in ever decreasing circles and inevitably about loss and rebuilding. The fact that this applies to most…
IT is the best bit though, don't you think?
I said after the prison.
2016 still has its fingers jammed up our buttholes for four weeks, I'd hold those cards close to your chest on that until then.
I doubt Joel will be around for long, so some variation on that theme seems like a strong chance.
I was a big Walking Dead comic fan, still am, but one who continually finds the to show dumbed down and weak.
I did the exact same, but in retrospect it was a little too kooky for Ellie.
I'm happy to trade the ambiguity with the chance to re-enter that world, the guitars, the undulating space and pace, the interplay. It pretty much banged the nail on the head for me of post apocalyptic world building. The sense of emptiness and dread but with that flicker of hope.
I played the game through and was as smitten with that world as others seemed to have been. Why did Joel get shown to be anything other than a hero throughout the game? Genuine question. I know his end choice was ultimately selfish but this is a love story, a survival story, and I know he took the weaker path there…
Bernard is a host creation, that's my tip for the finale.
Strangely, I've not been able to get into the post reunion stuff with as much glee as you, and most others seem to have. Also, I love the post-Barlow records. Green Mind and Where You Been are towering, wonderful records.
He would hate Stannis for what he did to Shereen but id hardly describe the smoke-demon-queefing Red Woman as better company seeing as she inspired the murder.
Cage goes in water, shark in water.
Thank you for moralising, I don't care where you get your opinions from, and nothing online ever surprises me when it is a discussion. I don't consider downloading a noble thing, in fact I mentioned more than once that it relates to economic factors for me.
Does it really matter to you? The cat is out of the bag, the music industry has had to change its priorities, and I download Metallica!
Well I'm not sixteen but cash isn't stacking up under my bed or in my account! I grew up listening to Husker Du and other smaller bands, they got every penny I had, it basically boils down to whether I can afford to buy a lot of the time, but, for example, RM Hubbard always gets my money for a new release, because he…
As I said if it is a smaller artist I'd still cough up the dough most of the time. I've fed a lot of cash into bands and labels I like. One mans theft is another mans stealth consumerism.
I can assure you i need the cash more than Lars Ulrich does.
Ive always felt that music is a performance thing primarily. I download music without paying, I wouldn't if my economic situation was better, but I have no qualms about it. If it's a small band or person I tend to buy music, and I attend a good amount of gigs too.