disquslzdwak9feu--disqus
Erik
disquslzdwak9feu--disqus

Again, you assume the worst and then presume to say you forgive me? Because YOU think I don't want to stand with you? Because YOU think I have no fight in me? You forgive me for sins that YOU think describe me? When you don't tell people what they believe maybe YOU will be taken seriously.

Wow. It was not baiting. What you choose to read into my post is…well, do I really need to say it?

I do not pay lip service and it is that kind of suspicious presumption that is counter-intuitive to peace. If you think every single person who talks about love and forgiveness is a mealy-mouthed, luke warm lip servicer, then you will NEVER allow anyone who actually wants peace and is able and willing to speak in

It is clear you read what you think I said INTO what I actually said. Him not going to his inauguration is NOT the issue. It's saying and influencing a swath of people to not see Trump as a legitimate president. He doesn't have to go to the inauguration. He doesn't have to like him. That is not at all what I said.

Nothing you quoted contradicts my position. And I did read it and you quoted one section of a lengthy letter. Rebuking the white moderate is not the same as hate. There is action that needs to be done but it must be done in love and must not exacerbate immorality:

Is he a jerk because he's actually wrong? Or just because he's white and "how dare he". That is clearly the spirit here. If he's wrong, sure. If Rep. Lewis is wrong, then it doesn't matter who tells him. Having walked with MLK doesn't give him a pass to be right no matter what he says. If he diverges from that

I am not whitesplaining anything. You need to stop with the race baiting and assuming I am some Trump robot. I am not. I think Trump IS a fool for MANY reasons and is why I didn't vote for him. But what Rep. Lewis isn't rebuking Trump, he's inciting more division. That is not what MLK would have done and I have read

Your question is loaded, baiting question which presumes a position I don't take. So, there's no answer to give you because you're asking me a question to account for something I don't believe. You shoot from the hip based on your contempt for anyone who disagrees with you, so you ask silly questions. That's on you. I

If you think I am misinterpreting history, you're welcome to show me where MLK slandered white folks and told his fellow black men and women to show hatred and scorn to them. Have you even read Letters From a Birmingham Jail?

You don't need a white person. You just need to actually read history and see how MLK ACTUALLY succeeded. I am pointing you to history. You're making this about race baiting. That's on you.

Yup. Didn't read. Or you would know this has nothing to do with Trump. This is about MLK and his legacy. And what he stood for. I actually didn't vote for Trump and think he's dangerous for all kinds of different reasons. But when you choose to ignore rational discourse and instead presume someone's position, it is

You can call me names all you want. But until you actually provide an intelligent response or at least some evidence from the life of MLK and how he handled persecution that contradicts why he is celebrated in the first place, then you're just a bully who cannot stand anyone who disagrees with you but without any

My post is being laughed at by someone with the handle, Mr. Poopy Butthole. I see your LOL and raise you a ROFL. :)