disquslkvnju2e1c--disqus
Ned Racine
disquslkvnju2e1c--disqus

"Hmmm, this $13 million entry for muffins….."

"21st Century Fox as a zero tolerance policy for any employee whose sexual indiscretions we paid to go away but subsequently gets covered in a story by a major news agency anyway."

And when this era is looked at through the objectivity of distance, their jaws will drop at the thought that the ejection of this anthropomorphic scrotum was debatable.

There really is an important message here: college age kids who go to beaches on Spring Break are irritating as fuck and shallow as piss on a rock. If this is your kid, please get a novel in their hands, or they will grow up to be a Fox reporter who does stories on Spring Break in 20 years.

I can understand the comment from David re the record being from 'cool' people and not being one of them. Hearing it for the first time about 30 years ago, I couldn't relate. It was vaguely frightening, the way it may have been to be thrust into a drug addled room of nihilists whereas I was a suburban kid from Canada.

I love all those records, even if some are sporadic. Dylan is the exception to all of the above, for me personally. Greil Marcus' comment about buying an album of dylan breathing heavily applies to me.

That is uncanny - I was going to cite Dylan as my personal exception to this rule as well. Though I will say that I have only skimmed some of the recent official bootleg releases.

You are right… New Adventures is great. I forgot. And again, it's not that post-New Adventures was bad, per se. It just wasn't… necessary? I am grappling with the right adjective.

Work with me here: I think there's a lot of bands who one simply tires of because of their consistency. It appears to happen after about 10 years of fandom. In the 80's, from October to Achtung Baby, U2 was my thing. Then there were a couple of meh albums, and now, if someone said that the next U2 album made people

Your first paragraph closely matches my take on it. The realism of Naz's ordeal in the system seems to me to have been the point, the mystery a macGuffin. And because the whodunnit was secondary, it is also arbitrary. It could have been solved in 3 or 4 different ways in the last episode without affecting the material

All along I've felt like the mystery of whodunnit was a MacGuffin , intended to provide the impetus for the naturalistic depiction of Naz's ordeal. It had to look like he did it, so he'd be pulled the full length of the horror. But now the resolution of that mystery has to be fumbled towards, and they set up their

It's never clear. Jackman never thinks to mention it himself, which, if I had a set of balls hanging from my neck, I'd feel compelled to warn any blind date.

The first skit, with the balls on the neck, exemplifies everything that is wrong with the movie. Once they introduce the balls, the joke is: no one except Kate Winslet notices! Why is that funny? If you are going to introduce someone with balls hanging off their neck, why not treat it realistically? Everyone would

Two Oscar wins? IMDB begs to differ.

We're through.

facepalm!

Keep this up and we'll have a discussion around a round or two in the ring.

I'll get over your underwhelmed understanding of my oversight over sight.

It was an oversight over sight.

At the time of his death, I discovered Roy Orbison was not blind.