I'm pretty sure that friend was Roger Ebert

Guy Fieri is tough to watch. But Diners, Drive-Ins and Dives is a brilliant show.

If Trump and Clinton were the only two candidates, then the argument to vote for Clinton because Trump would be a disastrous president might hold sway. But they're not. There are 5 candidates with enough ballot access to win (4 realistically). So not as bad as the worst candidate isn't a good enough argument.

Those who suggest Clinton's intense scrutiny is due to her gender have clearly never paid attention to a presidential election before. The concern isn't Clinton's gender, it's that Trump's supporters simply don't care about the honesty, transparency, or good character of their candidate, so the news investigates those…

I think you've hit the problem on the head. The best thing people have to say about Clinton is that she's not as bad as Trump. Well now that we've all agreed on that, can we agree that being concerned that a candidate for president was found extremely careless about national security by the non-partisan FBI director…

My candidate? You'd have to be a true idiot to vote for Trump. Doesn't give you a reason to dismiss all Clinton concerns as misogyny.

It must be nice to have such a convenient way to dismiss all problems with your candidate. Once you're finished with your martyr complex, there are serious people with serious concerns.