ppl went to Rogue one in droves despite the shitty cgi, of course they are securing rights.

regardless, i think the wide-eyed luke in the first movie suited him the best.

I keep seeing ppl say that, but they're clearly not all 12, they can vote.

Aliens is overrated; Terminator is endlessly better.

please, the dumb anti Temple rants are far worse. Crusade is legitimately a Raiders redux, but rarely gets any disparaging at all.

he's had the earring since the late 90s, time to make like Frozen.

the hardest will be to get the buttlicking Mad Max got for whatever undeserved reason.

we should be so lucky if it's Temple. the "grousing" for that movie can just gtfo.

…or anyone with sense is less likely to think in stereotypes. but you seem here to pick a fight.

Everything he's saying should be common sense, and yet..

Her character screams a lot, as a fish out of water character. "that shrieky woman" is dismissive bs that everyone writes it off as. if you were 11, I don't know, maybe you started it instead of following it.

No. Crusade gets immediate love and discounting of all faults (similar plot to Raiders, watered down versions of scenes that already happened in Raiders that other movies would get heaps of criticism for re-doing) because of the father/son dynamic.
Temple on the other hand, gets immediate hate because it's cool to…

*stab

No it seems people are still not tired of pontificating about Leo's "brilliance".

"that shrieky woman". man everyone is so proud of aping the same bullshit over and over.

Because they actually watched it without prejudice and decided they have an opinion outside the dumb hivemind?

what on earth is shocking about it?

he is also super stubborn. also between lucas's 'he's a hero of kiddies! dont have him kill anyone' thing he did with Han and in Indy 4, and something ballsier, it would not be a bad thing to do another Raiders..

John Book, you philistine.

the gorgeous red tint?