Well, considering the 1990s contained the worst decade in music history…

Whatever.

Yes, but it was only inferred. It was equally possible that he had stolen the book from her, for example. Or that she had died and he was trying to change history to save her. Now we know, and so the mystery deepens.

In the first episode it was established that Flynn knew Lucy and at least considered her a colleague if not a friend. But how he got her book was not really mentioned, nor were Flynn's motivations.

I thought this second episode was leagues ahead of the first. At least this time it felt like the characters really cared about what was happening, instead of just being along for the ride. This time we got a much deeper mystery about Flynn and Lucy's history/future. This time I thought they did a much better job with…

I really liked the film. It had an adult couple who loved each other and a son who desperately missed his dad who died decades earlier. This gave the film an earnestness, as these characters had something very personal at stake as they tried to "fix" the past. I have not seen the new show to see how the dynamic…

Time travel stories inherently have issues with paradoxes. Smart ones avoid the issue or hand-wave it away. Timeless tries to address it, but that just makes it worse. Our heroes go back in time and when they return their present is immediately different. But somehow all the same people are still in all the same…

Cosby used nonsense words like that from the beginning of his comedy career (e.g., "hober seeber reber sober") which eventually led to his Mushmouth character on Fat Albert. It's part of what made him famous in the first place.