So, he had an affair, now he must be labelled a counter-revolutionary and all his work redefined as the doings of the enemy?

Then that makes him a bad husband, nothing more.

But all affairs involve lying, saying it's lying as if pretty much all affairs don't involve lying is disingenuous.

Really hope this site issues a correction given how many people pointed this out.

So, to be clear, what forms of cheating would be acceptable?

What is the difference?

Thank you for expressing this so concisely.

Only if your null hypothesis is that anyone who says anything is honest until proven otherwise.

One is saying the person is lying the other is saying we don't have sufficient evidence to tell whether the statement made is true or not.

Seemed less like he was calling her a liar than saying she was a biased source.

This is an interesting question. Are you saying if women had more power they would be just as likely to sexually harass men? Or that the inequality in terms of men and women at the workplace is somehow Joss Whedon's fault?