I don't understand the connection you're drawing between release date inadequacies and whether death threats are cool or not.
JeffSmith
disqusk7zummreoo--disqus
Seriously, never a truer word.
Well-extrapolated!
I can solve this for you - they're morons.
Don't worry about Ashton, he's a terrible actor but apparently a pretty smart investor - he's super rich.
Oh hai, Hoat.
… is this a time-travelling gimmick account from 1997?
Well, short of an actual peer-reviewed study, I don't know how I'd ever prove something like that. It's my opinion based on what I've seen of the arguments about the movie. If you disagree, fantastic, but I'll have to continue to think you're wrong.
I have to cite sources for an abstract like people's opinions? Alright, here goes nothing.
Yes.
Star Wars is a great example - people born after 1990 generally think the Prequels are by far the superior films because the originals are slow and look cheesy to them. I mean, congratulations on the extremely specific example of your own children, but I'm talking about the world that exists outside of your personal…
They're watchable if someone is of a mind to look into it, but they don't actively appeal to a generation that was born after they were made as a general rule. Everything about them looks old fashioned and inaccessible to someone raised on modern movie-making techniques.
This is one of the few cases where I don't object to a remake. This story really should be retold to every generation and you can't just show a 40 year-old movie and expect it to still be watchable to a new generation.
I guarantee he'd end up married to your imaginary daughter.
Ans: Hulk
Mmmmmmm! "Pork-based" patty.
"Ok, we're almost there. We've got 'A new kickstarter wants to help you lick your…' and we just need one more word to cap it off. Can anyone think of a punchier word for cat?"
And an awesome rapper
She could record the music, but Sony would probably sue to prevent it being sold anyplace that has copyright laws.